Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sarla Devi Vs. State of Haryana and Another

Sarla Devi vs State of Haryana and Another

Type Court Judgment Court Punjab and Haryana Decided May 23, 2014
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1141337

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sarla Devi

Respondent

State of Haryana and Another

Excerpt

.....but till date no decision thereon has been taken or conveyed to the petitioner. counsel contends that the petitioner, at this stage, would be satisfied if a direction is issued to the director, social justice & empowerment department, haryana-respondent no.2 to consider and decide the legal notice dated 10.02.2014 (annexure p-11) served by the petitioner, within some specified time. kumar ramesh 2014.05.26 10:26 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document high court chandigarh civil writ petition no.10243 of 2014 {2} in view of the statement made by the counsel for the petitioner and without going into the merit of the case or commenting thereon, the present writ petition is disposed of with directions to the director, social justice & empowerment department, haryana-respondent no.2 to consider and decide the legal notice dated 10.02.2014 (annexure p-11) within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. in case the claim of the petitioner is not to be accepted, then a well reasoned and speaking order be passed and conveyed to the petitioner forthwith. may 23, 2014 ( augustine george masih ) ramesh judge kumar ramesh 2014.05.26 10:26 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document high court chandigarh

Full Judgment

Civil Writ Petition No.10243 of 2014 {1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: May 23, 2014 Sarla Devi ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH Present: Mr.Ram Niwas Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

***** AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J.(ORAL) Petitioner has approached this Court with a grievance that despite her juniors having been granted the promotion to the post of an Assistant without insisting upon passing of the type test vide order dated 13.03.2013 (Annexure P-10).the same benefit has not been granted to her.

Petitioner had been approaching the respondents for the similar benefit to be conferred upon her but without any result.

Petitioner thereafter has served a legal notice dated 10.02.2014 (Annexure P-11) upon the respondents, but till date no decision thereon has been taken or conveyed to the petitioner.

Counsel contends that the petitioner, at this stage, would be satisfied if a direction is issued to the Director, Social Justice & Empowerment Department, Haryana-respondent No.2 to consider and decide the legal notice dated 10.02.2014 (Annexure P-11) served by the petitioner, within some specified time.

Kumar Ramesh 2014.05.26 10:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh Civil Writ Petition No.10243 of 2014 {2} In view of the statement made by the counsel for the petitioner and without going into the merit of the case or commenting thereon, the present writ petition is disposed of with directions to the Director, Social Justice & Empowerment Department, Haryana-respondent No.2 to consider and decide the legal notice dated 10.02.2014 (Annexure P-11) within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

In case the claim of the petitioner is not to be accepted, then a well reasoned and speaking order be passed and conveyed to the petitioner forthwith.

May 23, 2014 ( AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH ) ramesh JUDGE Kumar Ramesh 2014.05.26 10:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial