Raj Kumar Sharma and Another Vs. State of Haryana and Another

Raj Kumar Sharma and Another vs State of Haryana and Another

Type Court Judgment Court Punjab and Haryana Decided May 20, 2014

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1141007

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1141007
Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Decided On: May 20, 2014
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Raj Kumar Sharma and Another

Respondent

State of Haryana and Another

Excerpt

.....versus state of haryana and another ...respondents coram: hon'ble mr.justice r.p.nagrath present: mr.r.k.handa, advocate for the petitioners.mr.manish deswal, dag, haryana for the state. mr.amandeep singh, advocate for respondent no.2.r.p.nagrath, j. (oral) the instant petition has been filed for quashing fir no.950 dated 25.9.2013 for offences under sections 323, 354-d, 506, 34 ipc, police station city karnal, district karnal and the subsequent proceedings on the basis of written compromise arrived at between the parties. report from the trial court has been received after recording the statements of parties, alongwith original statements. it is reported that compromise is voluntary and without any coercion or undue influence. kumar suresh 2014.05.22 10:06 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh crm no.m-1748 of 2014 2 learned state counsel submits that petitioners are the only accused in this fir, which was recorded by respondent no.2 who is the only aggrieved person. no useful purpose would be served in continuing the proceedings in this case in view of the compromise arrived at between them. following the principles laid down by the full bench judgement of this court in kulwinder singh and others v. state of punjab and another, 2007 (3) rcr (criminal) 1052 (p&h) and approved by the hon'ble supreme court in gian singh versus state of punjab and others.(2012)10 scc303 this petition is allowed and fir no.950 dated 25.9.2013 for offences under sections 323, 354-d, 506, 34 ipc, police station city karnal, district karnal and the subsequent proceedings conducted on the basis thereof, are quashed. needless to say that parties shall remain bound by the terms of compromise and their statements. (r.p.nagrath) 20.05.2014 judge sk kumar suresh 2014.05.22 10:06 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh

Full Judgment

CRM No.M-1748 of 2014 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-1748 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: 20.05.2014 Raj Kumar Sharma and another ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.P.NAGRATH Present: Mr.R.K.Handa, Advocate for the petitioneRs.Mr.Manish Deswal, DAG, Haryana for the State.

Mr.Amandeep Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2.

R.P.Nagrath, J.

(Oral) The instant petition has been filed for quashing FIR No.950 dated 25.9.2013 for offences under Sections 323, 354-D, 506, 34 IPC, Police Station City Karnal, District Karnal and the subsequent proceedings on the basis of written compromise arrived at between the parties.

Report from the trial Court has been received after recording the statements of parties, alongwith original statements.

It is reported that compromise is voluntary and without any coercion or undue influence.

Kumar Suresh 2014.05.22 10:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRM No.M-1748 of 2014 2 Learned State counsel submits that petitioners are the only accused in this FIR, which was recorded by respondent No.2 who is the only aggrieved person.

No useful purpose would be served in continuing the proceedings in this case in view of the compromise arrived at between them.

Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgement of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others v.

State of Punjab and another, 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 (P&H) and approved by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh versus State of Punjab and otheRs.(2012)10 SCC303 this petition is allowed and FIR No.950 dated 25.9.2013 for offences under Sections 323, 354-D, 506, 34 IPC, Police Station City Karnal, District Karnal and the subsequent proceedings conducted on the basis thereof, are quashed.

Needless to say that parties shall remain bound by the terms of compromise and their statements.

(R.P.Nagrath) 20.05.2014 Judge sk Kumar Suresh 2014.05.22 10:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

Same Court & Year Punjab and Haryana · 2014 Same Parties Raj Kumar Sharma and Another vs State of Haryana and Another Same Subject Education