Present: Mr. Arvind Singh Advocate Vs. Unknown

Present: Mr. Arvind Singh Advocate vs Unknown

Type Court Judgment Court Punjab and Haryana Decided May 19, 2014

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1140518

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1140518
Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Decided On: May 19, 2014
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Present: Mr. Arvind Singh Advocate

Respondent

Unknown

Excerpt

.....mentioned in the custody certificates is rigorous imprisonment for 07 years.it appears that there is a typographical mistake. the judgment available on the record shows that the accused were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 06 years under section 307 ipc. out of 06 years.applicant-appellant no.2 ajaib singh @ jaiba has undergone 02 years.03 months and 10 days whereas applicant-appellant gurmail ram @ gej has undergone 02 years.03 months and 02 days. sunil 2014.05.19 16:31 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document crm no.31176 of 2013 in cra-s no.2253-sb of 2012 the appeal is of the year 2012. it will take some time to mature for final hearing. without commenting upon the merits of the case, the sentence imposed by the trial court upon applicants- appellants no.2 & 3 ajaib singh @ jaiba and gurmail ram @ gej stand suspended during the pendency of this appeal and they are ordered to be released on bail on execution of bail and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the chief judicial magistrate/duty magistrate, s.b.s.nagar. the application stands allowed. (anita chaudhry) judge may 19, 2014 sunil sunil 2014.05.19 16:31 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Full Judgment

CRM No.31176 of 2013 in CRA-S No.2253-SB of 2012 Parminder Kumar @ Pindi & ORS.versus State of Punjab -*- Present: Mr.Arvind Singh, Advocate for applicants-appellants no.2 & 3.

Mr.Gazi Mohd.,DAG, Punjab, counsel for the respondent.

-*- Applicants-appellants no.2 & 3 Ajaib Singh @ Jaiba and Gurmail Ram @ Gej have preferred this application seeking suspension of sentence, during the pendency of this appeal.

Applicants-appellants Ajaib Singh @ Jaiba and Gurmail Ram @ Gej have been convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 06 years under Section 307 IPC.

The counsel for the applicants-appellants states that the applicants are in custody since 02 yeaRs.03 months and 10 days.

It is stated that Co.accused Parminder Kumar @ Pindi's application for suspension of sentence was allowed and they seek parity.

The custody certificates filed by the State are taken on record.

The sentence mentioned in the custody certificates is rigorous imprisonment for 07 yeaRs.It appears that there is a typographical mistake.

The judgment available on the record shows that the accused were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 06 years under Section 307 IPC.

Out of 06 yeaRs.applicant-appellant no.2 Ajaib Singh @ Jaiba has undergone 02 yeaRs.03 months and 10 days whereas applicant-appellant Gurmail Ram @ Gej has undergone 02 yeaRs.03 months and 02 days.

Sunil 2014.05.19 16:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM No.31176 of 2013 in CRA-S No.2253-SB of 2012 The appeal is of the year 2012.

It will take some time to mature for final hearing.

Without commenting upon the merits of the case, the sentence imposed by the trial Court upon applicants- appellants no.2 & 3 Ajaib Singh @ Jaiba and Gurmail Ram @ Gej stand suspended during the pendency of this appeal and they are ordered to be released on bail on execution of bail and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, S.B.S.Nagar.

The application stands allowed.

(ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE May 19, 2014 sunil Sunil 2014.05.19 16:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Same Court & Year Punjab and Haryana · 2014 Same Parties Present: Mr. Arvind Singh Advocate vs Unknown Same Subject Education