Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Devinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Devinder Singh vs State of Punjab

Type Court Judgment Court Punjab and Haryana Decided May 13, 2014
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1139957

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Decided On
Subject
Narcotics

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Narcotics

Key legal issue
Narcotics

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Devinder Singh

Respondent

State of Punjab

Excerpt

.....months; the applicant- appellant is neither involved nor required in any other case; and that there are fairly arguable points in the appeal.3. learned counsel for the state has produced the custody certificate received by him through fax from the kapoor prashant 2014.05.14 10:13 i attest to the accuracy of this order crm-2223-2014 in cra-s-312-sb-2014 2 superintendent, central jail, ludhiana, showing the period of incarceration suffered by the applicant-appellant, which is taken on record.4. heard.5. perusal of the custody certificate reveals that the applicant-appellant has suffered incarceration for six months and twenty-one days as on date. he is neither required nor involved in any other case. there are fairly arguable points in the appeal, which is not likely to be heard and decided in the near future.6. in view of the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, the present application is allowed. the execution of the remaining substantive sentence of the applicant-appellant, devinder singh, son of surjan singh, resident of village manakwal, district ludhiana, is ordered to be suspended during pendency of the appeal, subject to his furnishing bail bond to the satisfaction of the learned chief judicial magistrate/duty magistrate, ludhiana. (naresh kumar sanghi) may 13, 2014 judge pkapoor kapoor prashant 2014.05.14 10:13 i attest to the accuracy of this order

Full Judgment

CRM-2223-2014 in CRA-S-312-SB-2014 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-2223-2014 in CRA-S-312-SB-2014 Date of Decision: May 13, 2014 Devinder Singh …Appellant Versus State of Punjab …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI Present: Mr. K.P.S. Virk, Advocate, for the applicant-appellant. Mr. K.S. Pannu, DAG, Punjab, for the respondent. NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.

1. Prayer in this application is for suspension of sentence of the applicant-appellant, Devinder Singh, son of Surjan Singh, resident of Village Manakwal, District Ludhiana, who was held guilty for having committed the offence punishable under Section 15 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for brevity, 'the NDPS Act'), and ordered to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years besides payment of fine of `5,000/- and in default thereof to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for two months.

2. Learned counsel contends that out of the substantive sentence of two years, the applicant-appellant has already suffered incarceration for more than six months; the applicant- appellant is neither involved nor required in any other case; and that there are fairly arguable points in the appeal.

3. Learned counsel for the State has produced the custody certificate received by him through Fax from the Kapoor Prashant 2014.05.14 10:13 I attest to the accuracy of this order CRM-2223-2014 in CRA-S-312-SB-2014 2 Superintendent, Central Jail, Ludhiana, showing the period of incarceration suffered by the applicant-appellant, which is taken on record.

4. Heard.

5. Perusal of the custody certificate reveals that the applicant-appellant has suffered incarceration for six months and twenty-one days as on date. He is neither required nor involved in any other case. There are fairly arguable points in the appeal, which is not likely to be heard and decided in the near future.

6. In view of the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, the present application is allowed. The execution of the remaining substantive sentence of the applicant-appellant, Devinder Singh, son of Surjan Singh, resident of Village Manakwal, District Ludhiana, is ordered to be suspended during pendency of the appeal, subject to his furnishing bail bond to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, Ludhiana. (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) May 13, 2014 JUDGE Pkapoor Kapoor Prashant 2014.05.14 10:13 I attest to the accuracy of this order

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial