Kamaljeet Kaur Vs.

Type Court Judgment Court Punjab and Haryana Decided May 12, 2014

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1139881

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1139881
Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Decided On: May 12, 2014
Subject: Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue: Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Kamaljeet Kaur

Excerpt

.....has been sandeep sethi 2014.05.13 16:11 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document cwp no.26660 of 2013 -2- allowed by the ugc till 01.06.2014 and one of the requirements of such accreditation is appointment of a qualified librarian. moreover, library needs to be set as per the requirements of national assessment and accreditation (naac).which has not been done so far. therefore, it was felt by the respondents that a qualified librarian and an asst. librarian is required in addition to the petitioner. that in view of the above, requirement of setting up of the library as per naac requirements and for smooth running of the work, the advertisement in question was issued on 23.11.2013 to engage a qualified librarian and asst. librarian on adhoc basis in addition to the post occupied by the petitioner. as such the apprehension expressed by the petitioner is misplaced. thus, in view of these facts no cause of action arose for the petitioner to file and pursue this petition and the same may be disposed of as having rendered infructuous.”. in view of the short reply filed by respondent nos.4 to 6, this petition has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of accordingly. (sabina) judge may 12, 2014. sandeep sethi sandeep sethi 2014.05.13 16:11 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Full Judgment

CWP No.26660 of 2013 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (241) CWP No.26660 of 2013 Date of decision:-12.05.2014.

Kamaljeet Kaur ......Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr.R.S.Bajaj, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.Sushant Maini, DAG, Punjab.

Mr.Aman Chaudhary, Advocate for respondents No.4 to 6.

**** SABINA, J.

Petitioner has filed this petition challenging the advertisement on the ground that the respondents were seeking to terminate her services.

Para 5 and 6 of the short reply filed by respondent Nos.4 to 6 read as under:- “That the respondent-college has to get its accreditation extended by National Assessment and Accreditation (NAAC).for which, the time has been Sandeep Sethi 2014.05.13 16:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP No.26660 of 2013 -2- allowed by the UGC till 01.06.2014 and one of the requirements of such accreditation is appointment of a qualified Librarian.

Moreover, Library needs to be set as per the requirements of National Assessment and Accreditation (NAAC).which has not been done so far.

Therefore, it was felt by the respondents that a qualified Librarian and an Asst.

Librarian is required in addition to the petitioner.

That in view of the above, requirement of setting up of the library as per NAAC requirements and for smooth running of the work, the advertisement in question was issued on 23.11.2013 to engage a qualified Librarian and Asst.

Librarian on adhoc basis in addition to the post occupied by the petitioner.

As such the apprehension expressed by the petitioner is misplaced.

Thus, in view of these facts no cause of action arose for the petitioner to file and pursue this petition and the same may be disposed of as having rendered infructuous.”

In view of the short reply filed by respondent Nos.4 to 6, this petition has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of accordingly.

(SABINA) JUDGE May 12, 2014.

sandeep sethi Sandeep Sethi 2014.05.13 16:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Same Court & Year Punjab and Haryana · 2014 Same Parties Kamaljeet Kaur vs Same Subject Service Tax