Full Judgment
CRM-M No.12173 of 2014 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-12173 of 2014 Date of decision : 28.04.2014 Happy Sachdeva and another ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana ..Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Mr.Lal Singh Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioneRs.Mr.H.S.Deol, Addl.
A.G., Haryana for the State.
Mr.G.S.Sidhu, Advocate for the complainant.
**** Mehinder Singh Sullar, J.
(Oral) Petitioners-Happy Sachdeva son of Surinder Sachdeva and Mintu @ Sandeep, have preferred the instant petition for the grant of concession of anticipatory bail, invoking the provisions of Section 438 Cr.P.C., in a case registered against them, vide FIR No.233 dated 03.04.2013, on accusation of having committed the offences punishable under Sections 307, 323, 325, 148, 149, 427, 506 and 452 IPC, by the police of Police Station City Sirsa, District Sirsa, in which they were summoned to face the trial as an additional accused in the wake of application under Section 319 Cr.P.C., filed by the prosecution.
2.
Notice of the petition was issued to the State.
Sumit Kumar 2014.04.28 17:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M No.12173 of 2014 -2- 3.
After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, going through the record with their valuable assistance and after deep consideration of the entire matter, to my mind, the present petition for anticipatory bail deserves to be accepted in this context.
4.
During the couRs.of preliminary hearing, the following order was passed by this Court on April 07, 2014:- “Learned counsel, inter alia, contended that initially the present criminal case was registered against the petitioneRs.During the couRs.of investigation, they were found innocent and were exonerated by the police.
Subsequently, in the wake of application under Section 319 Cr.P.C., filed by the prosecution, they were summoned as additional accused, to face the trial, for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 307, 323, 325, 148, 427, 506 and 452 read with Section 149 IPC, by the trial Court.
Moreover, all the injuries attributed to the petitioners are simple in nature.
Heard.
Notice of motion be issued to the respondent, returnable for 28.04.2014.
Meanwhile, the petitioners are directed to appear/surrender before the next date of hearing and the trial Court would admit them to interim (provisional) bail, on their furnishing adequate bail and surety bonds to its satisfaction.”
.
5.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has placed on record the certified copy of the order dated 17.04.2014, which would reveal that the bail bonds & surety bonds furnished by the petitioneRs.in pursuance of the order of this Court, were accepted and attested by the trial Court.
6.
In the light of aforesaid reasons, the instant petition for anticipatory bail is accepted and the interim(provisional) bail already granted to the petitioners by this Court, by virtue of order dated April 07, 2014 is hereby made absolute.
28.04.2014 (Mehinder Singh Sullar) sumit.k Judge Sumit Kumar 2014.04.28 17:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document