Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Prince and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Prince and ors. vs State of Punjab and ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Punjab and Haryana Decided Apr 25, 2014
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1138494

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Prince and ors.

Respondent

State of Punjab and ors.

Excerpt

.....coram:- hon'ble ms.justice anita chaudhry present: mr.ritesh pandey, advocate for petitioner no.1. mr.g.p.singh, advocate for petitioners no.2 and 3. ms.sunanda rattan, addl. ag punjab. mr.a.s.bhait, advocate for respondents no.2 to 4. ___ anita chaudhry, j(oral) the petitioners are seeking quashing of fir no.57 dated 17.03.2013, registered under sections 148, 323 and 324 ipc read with section 149 ipc, police station city batala, police district batala and the consequent proceedings taken therein on the basis of compromise (annexure p-2)arrived at between the parties. report has been received from the trial court after recording statements of the parties on compromise. trial court has also sent copy of statements of complainant and injured sharma jiten 2014.04.29 16:57 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document high court chandigarh crl. misc. no.m-18729 of 2013 2 recorded by it, which reveal that compromise is voluntary and without any pressure or coercion. learned state counsel submits that the petitioners are the only accused and respondent nos.2 to 4 are the only aggrieved persons in the fir. no useful purpose would be served to keep the fir pending. in view of the statements and report of the trial court and the principles laid down by the full bench judgment of this court in kulwinder singh & ors.versus state of punjab & anr. 2007(3) rcr(crl.) 1052, approved by hon'ble the apex court in gian singh versus state of punjab & ors.2012(10) scc303 the instant petition is allowed and the aforesaid fir and all consequent proceedings conducted therein are quashed. needless to say that parties shall remain bound by the terms of compromise and their statements made in the court below. april 25, 2014 (anita chaudhry) jiten judge sharma jiten 2014.04.29 16:57 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document high court chandigarh

Full Judgment

Crl.

Misc.

No.M-18729 of 2013 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.

Misc.

No.M-18729 of 2013 Date of decision : 25.04.2014 Prince & Ors.....Petitioners versus State of Punjab and Ors..Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE Ms.JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY Present: Mr.Ritesh Pandey, Advocate for petitioner no.1.

Mr.G.P.Singh, Advocate for petitioners no.2 and 3.

Ms.Sunanda Rattan, Addl.

AG Punjab.

Mr.A.S.Bhait, Advocate for respondents no.2 to 4.

___ ANITA CHAUDHRY, J(ORAL) The petitioners are seeking quashing of FIR No.57 dated 17.03.2013, registered under Sections 148, 323 and 324 IPC read with Section 149 IPC, Police Station City Batala, Police District Batala and the consequent proceedings taken therein on the basis of compromise (Annexure P-2)arrived at between the parties.

Report has been received from the trial court after recording statements of the parties on compromise.

Trial Court has also sent copy of statements of complainant and injured Sharma Jiten 2014.04.29 16:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh Crl.

Misc.

No.M-18729 of 2013 2 recorded by it, which reveal that compromise is voluntary and without any pressure or coercion.

Learned State counsel submits that the petitioners are the only accused and respondent nos.2 to 4 are the only aggrieved persons in the FIR.

No useful purpose would be served to keep the FIR pending.

In view of the statements and report of the trial Court and the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh & ORS.versus State of Punjab & Anr.

2007(3) RCR(Crl.) 1052, approved by Hon'ble the Apex Court in Gian Singh versus State of Punjab & ORS.2012(10) SCC303 the instant petition is allowed and the aforesaid FIR and all consequent proceedings conducted therein are quashed.

Needless to say that parties shall remain bound by the terms of compromise and their statements made in the Court below.

April 25, 2014 (ANITA CHAUDHRY) Jiten JUDGE Sharma Jiten 2014.04.29 16:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Punjab and Haryana · 2014 Same Parties Prince and ors. vs State of Punjab and ors. Same Subject Education
Education

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales