Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Criminal Misc. No.6170 of 2014 in Vs. Criminal Misc. No.6170 of 2014 In

Criminal Misc. No.6170 of 2014 In vs Criminal Misc. No.6170 of 2014 In

Type Court Judgment Court Punjab and Haryana Decided Apr 22, 2014
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1137948

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Criminal Misc. No.6170 of 2014 In

Respondent

Criminal Misc. No.6170 of 2014 In

Excerpt

.....judgment of conviction dated 06.12.2013 and order of sentence dated 10.12.2013, passed in case fir no.63 dated 02.05.2013, held the applicant-appellant guilty for the commission of offence punishable under sections 325, 323 and 506 ipc and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of four years and to pay a fine of rs.2,000/- under section 325 ipc; rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months each under sections 323 and 506 ipc. feeling aggrieved against the said judgment of conviction and order of sentence, the applicant-appellant filed an appeal which has been admitted by this court vide order dated 20.12.2013. as per custody certificate, produced by learned state counsel, the applicant-appellant has already undergone 6 months and 2 days of actual sentence. the appeal is not likely to mature for hearing in the near future. therefore, in the facts and circumstances, the criminal miscellaneous application is allowed and the sentence of imprisonment of applicant- appellant during the pendency of appeal shall remain suspended and he is admitted to bail subject to his furnishing personal bonds and surety to the satisfaction of learned chief judicial magistrate/duty magistrate, amritsar. april 22, 2014 (inderjit singh) mamta malhotra mamta 2014.04.24 14:04 judge i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.

No.6170 of 2014 in Criminal Appeal No.S-4507-SB of 2013 Date of decision: April 22, 2014 Gurvail Singh ...Applicant-Appellant Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH Present: Ms.Gursharan K.

Mann, Advocate, for the applicant-appellant.

Mr.Mikhail Kad, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, for the respondent-State.

**** INDERJIT SINGH, J.

Custody certificate has been produced.

Same is taken on record.

Prayer in the present application is for suspension of sentence of applicant-appellant Gurvail Singh during the pendency of appeal.

Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Amritsar, vide judgment of conviction dated 06.12.2013 and order of sentence dated 10.12.2013, passed in case FIR No.63 dated 02.05.2013, held the applicant-appellant guilty for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 325, 323 and 506 IPC and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of four years and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/- under Section 325 IPC; rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months each under Sections 323 and 506 IPC.

Feeling aggrieved against the said judgment of conviction and order of sentence, the applicant-appellant filed an appeal which has been admitted by this Court vide order dated 20.12.2013.

As per custody certificate, produced by learned State counsel, the applicant-appellant has already undergone 6 months and 2 days of actual sentence.

The appeal is not likely to mature for hearing in the near future.

Therefore, in the facts and circumstances, the criminal miscellaneous application is allowed and the sentence of imprisonment of applicant- appellant during the pendency of appeal shall remain suspended and he is admitted to bail subject to his furnishing personal bonds and surety to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, Amritsar.

April 22, 2014 (INDERJIT SINGH) mamta Malhotra Mamta 2014.04.24 14:04 JUDGE I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial