Judgment:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE1T DAY OF APRIL201411TH CHAITHRA, 1936 Bail Appl..No. 2211 of 2014 () ------------------------------- CRIME NO. 159/2014 OF THRIKKUNNAPPUZHA POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA --------------- PETITIONERS/ACCUSED : -------------------------------------- 1. HUSSAIN, AGED35YEARS S/O.SAITHUMUHAMMED, THAYYIL HOUSE, ARATTUPPUZHA P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT2 SUBAIDA, AGED54YEARS W/O.SAITHUMUHAMMED, THAYYIL HOUSE, ARATTUPUZHA P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT BY ADVS.SRI.V.MADHUSUDHANAN SRI.M IBRAHIMKUTTY RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT & STATE : -------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERAKULAM - 682031 2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, (CRIME NO. 159 OF2014, THRIKKUNNAPUZHA POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. R1 & R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. DHANESH MATHEW MANJOORAN THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON0104-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Mn N.K. BALAKRISHNAN, J.
------------------------------------------ B.A. No. 2211 of 2014 (B) ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 1st day of April, 2014 ORDER
Petitioners are accused in Crime No.159/2014 of Thrikkunnapuzha Police Station, Alappuzha District. The offence alleged is under section 498A r/w 34 of IPC. Apprehending arrest, this petition is filed for anticipatory bail.
2. The 1st petitioner is the husband of the defacto complainant and the 2nd petitioner is the mother of the 1st petitioner. It is alleged that the marriage between the 1st petitioner and the complainant took place on 7.7.2009. A male child was born to them in that wedlock. It is alleged that the petitioner subjected the defacto complainant to physical and mental cruelty demanding more gold and money. B.A. No. 2211/2014 (B) -2- 3. Considering all the aspects the following directions are issued: The petitioners shall surrender before the Investigating Officer within ten days from today. After interrogation the accused shall be produced before the learned Magistrate. When applied for bail by the accused, the learned Magistrate will, considering the nature of the case, grant bail to the petitioners but on the following conditions: a. The petitioners shall execute a bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five thousand only) each with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate. If in case the Magistrate has any doubt about the genuineness or correctness of the tax receipts produced by the sureties, the learned Magistrate can insist for production of the attested photo copies of the original title deeds of the sureties. B.A. No. 2211/2014 (B) -3- b. The petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by the Investigating Officer and the 1st petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer on all Mondays between 9.30 AM to 11.30 AM until further orders. c. The petitioners shall surrender their original passports before the learned jurisdictional Magistrate. If they are not having any valid passport, they should file an affidavit regarding the same before the Magistrate. d. The petitioners will also file an affidavit that they will abide by all the conditions as mentioned above and that they will not commit any offence similar to the offence involved in this case and will not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the B.A. No. 2211/2014 (B) -4- court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. e. The petitioners shall not leave India without the prior permission of the learned Magistrate. f. The learned Magistrate will also ensure the identity of the sureties by insisting production of electoral photo identity cards/Driving licence etc. Sd/- N.K. BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE //True Copy// P.A. to Judge jjj