Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Siddique Vs. State of Kerala

Siddique vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Apr 02, 2014
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1136867

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Siddique

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....225 and 308 r/w. sec. 149 of the penal code, apprehends arrest and has filed this application.2. learned public prosecutor has opposed the application. it is submitted that on 13.10.2012 at about 11:30 a.m. the petitioner and others attacked the de facto complainant with deadly weapons. final report is filed in the jfmc, kasaragod on 20.02.2014.3. learned counsel requested for pre-arrest bail.4. since the final report is already filed, custodial b.a. no. 2279 of 2014 2 interrogation of the petitioner does not appear to me as necessary. hence i am inclined to grant relief. application is allowed as under:1. petitioner is granted bail in crime no.570 of 2012 of the manjeswar police station. 2) petitioner shall surrender before the learned jfm, kasaragod in crime no.570 of 2012 of the manjeswar police station on 09.04.2014 at 11:00 a.m. 3) on such surrender, the petitioner shall be released on bail (if not required to be detained otherwise) on his executing bond for rs.20,000/- (rupees twenty thousand only) with two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned magistrate and subject to the following conditions:- a) petitioner shall report to the investigating officer who has investigated the case if and when required in connection with the case. b) petitioner shall not intimidate/influence the witnesses. b.a. no. 2279 of 2014 3 c) petitioner shall not, during the period of this bail get involved in any offence. d) in case of violation of any of the above conditions, it is open to the investigating officer to seek cancellation of the bail granted hereby by moving application before the learned jfm, kasaragod (until committal if any and thereafter before the learned principal sessions judge concerned) as held in p.k. shaji v. state of kerala (air2006 supreme court 100). e) it is directed that in case the petitioner does not surrender before the learned jfm, kasaragod as aforesaid, this order granting bail will cease to be effective on the expiry of.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH WEDNESDAY, THE2D DAY OF APRIL201412TH CHAITHRA, 1936 Bail Appl..No. 2279 of 2014 () ------------------------------- CRIME NO. 570/2012 OF MANJESHWAR POLICE STATION, KASARAGOD DISTRICT --------------------- PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.5 : -------------------------------------------- SIDDIQUE, AGED38YEARS S/O.LATE POKKER, BAIKATTA HOUSE, POST PAIVALIKE KASARAGOD TALUK, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI. K.P. HARISH RESPONDENTS/STATE OF KERALA & COMPLAINANT : -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM - 682 031.

2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, (CRIME NO.570 OF 2012 OF MANJESHWAR POLICE STATION) KASARAGOD DISTRICT - 671 312. R1 & R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. LALIZA THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON0204-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Mn THOMAS P. JOSEPH. J.

========================= Bail Application No. 2279 of 2014 ============================ Dated this the 2nd day of April, 2014 ORDER

Petitioner is the 5th accused in Crime No.570 of 2012 of the Manjeswar police station for the offences punishable under Secs.143, 147, 148, 341, 332, 225 and 308 r/w. Sec. 149 of the Penal Code, apprehends arrest and has filed this application.

2. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the application. It is submitted that on 13.10.2012 at about 11:30 a.m. the petitioner and others attacked the de facto complainant with deadly weapons. Final report is filed in the JFMC, Kasaragod on 20.02.2014.

3. Learned counsel requested for pre-arrest bail.

4. Since the final report is already filed, custodial B.A. NO. 2279 of 2014 2 interrogation of the petitioner does not appear to me as necessary. Hence I am inclined to grant relief. Application is allowed as under:

1. Petitioner is granted bail in Crime No.570 of 2012 of the Manjeswar police station. 2) Petitioner shall surrender before the learned JFM, Kasaragod in Crime No.570 of 2012 of the Manjeswar police station on 09.04.2014 at 11:00 a.m. 3) On such surrender, the petitioner shall be released on bail (if not required to be detained otherwise) on his executing bond for Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty thousand only) with two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned magistrate and subject to the following conditions:- a) Petitioner shall report to the investigating officer who has investigated the case if and when required in connection with the case. b) Petitioner shall not intimidate/influence the witnesses. B.A. NO. 2279 of 2014 3 c) Petitioner shall not, during the period of this bail get involved in any offence. d) In case of violation of any of the above conditions, it is open to the Investigating Officer to seek cancellation of the bail granted hereby by moving application before the learned JFM, Kasaragod (until committal if any and thereafter before the learned Principal Sessions Judge concerned) as held in P.K. Shaji V. State of Kerala (AIR2006 Supreme Court 100). e) It is directed that in case the petitioner does not surrender before the learned JFM, Kasaragod as aforesaid, this order granting bail will cease to be effective on the expiry of the time granted hereby. Sd/- THOMAS P.JOSEPH, JUDGE //true copy// P.A. to Judge Smv

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial