Hareesh Vs. the State of Kerala

Hareesh vs The State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Mar 27, 2014

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1135966

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1135966
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice N.K.Balakrishnan
Decided On: Mar 27, 2014
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Hareesh

Respondent

The State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....true copy of the charge sheet filed by the1t respondent against the petitioners. annexure a3 : a true copy of the fir and fi statement in crime no.379/2010 of koipuram police station. annexure a4 : a true copy of the charge sheet in crime no.379/2010 of koipuram police station. annexure a5 : the joint affidavit sworn to by the respondents2to5 respondent(s)' exhibits :- nil ----------------------------------- //true copy// p.a. to judge n.k.balakrishnan, j.-------------------------------- crl.m.c. no.1647 of 2014 ----------------------------------- dated this the 27th day of march 2014 order petitioners are the accused in s.c.no.257/2013 pending before first addl. sessions court, pathanamthitta. the offences alleged against them are punishable under secs.326 and 308 r/w 34 of ipc. the injured/aggrieved parties are arrayed as respondents 2 to 5. they are represented by their counsel. annexure a5 - joint affidavit has been filed by respondents 2 to 5 stating that the entire matter has been talked over and amicably settled. there is a counter case pending before cjm court, pathanamthitta as c.c.no.166/2010. it is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for both sides that, that case also has been settled out of court. parties are neighbours and so, in order to maintain harmony and peace, it is just and proper that both cases may be allowed to be disposed of as settled, it is submitted. hence, in the light of the settlement so arrived at, this crl.m.c. is allowed. further proceedings against these petitioners in s.c.no.257/2013 pending before first addl. sessions court, pathanamthitta is quashed. sd/- n.k.balakrishnan, j udge. jvt

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE27H DAY OF MARCH20146TH CHAITHRA, 1936 Crl.MC.No. 1647 of 2014 () --------------------------- SC2572013 of 1ST ADDL.SESSIONS COURT, PATHANAMTHITTA CRIME NO. 311/2010 OF KOIPURAM POLICE STATION ---------- PETITIONERS/ACCUSED :- ----------------------- 1. HAREESH, AGED27YEARS S/O.RAJAPPAN, KALAYIL PADINJATTETHIL PUTHENVEEDU, PULLAD P.O., KOIPURAM VILLAGE, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, PIN - 689 548.

2. SUNI @ SUNIL, AGED37YEARS S/O. KRISHNANKUTTY, KOKKATTU THARAYIL, HOUSE ALAMTHARA, KOIPURAM VILLAGE, PULLADU MURI PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.

3. ANEESH K. RAJAPPAN @ ANEESH, AGED26YEARS S/O.RAJAPPAN, KALAYIL PADINJATTETHIL PUTHENVEEDU PULLAD P.O., KOIPURAM VILLAGE, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT PIN - 689 548.

4. SUKU, AGED35YEARS S/O.THANKAPAN, KALAYIL PADINJATTETHIL PUTHENVEEDU PULLAD P.O., KOIPURAM VILLAGE PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT PIN - 689 548. BY ADV. SRI.K.A.SALIL NARAYANAN RESPONDENTS/STATE AND THE DE-FACTO COMPLAINANT & INJURED :- ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. THE STATE OF KERALA (SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE KOIPURAM POLICE STATION IN CRIME NO.379/2010) REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM - 682 031.

2. SEEJAN @ SREEJAN, AGED42YEARS S/O.NARAYANAN, ANCHUPURAKKAL HOUSE, MARAMANMURI THOTTAPUZHASERRY VILLAGE PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT - 689 645.

3. SUNIL, AGED36YEARS S/O.NARAYANAN, ANCHUPURAKKAL HOUSE, MARAMANMURI THOTTAPUZHASERRY VILLAGE, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. Crl.MC.No. 1647 of 2014 4. SURESH @ SURA, AGED32YEARS S/O.VASU, ANCHUPURAKKAL HOUSE, MARAMANMURI THOTTAPUZHASERRY VILLAGE PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT - 689 645.

5. SHAJI, AGED34YEARS S/O.KESAVAN, ANCHUPURAKKAL HOUSE, MARAMANMURI THOTTAPUZHASERRY VILLAGE PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT - 689 645. R2-R5 BY ADV. SRI.O.V.MANIPRASAD R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.RAJESH VIJAYAN THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON2703-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: jvt Crl.MC.No. 1647 of 2014 () --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS :- ------------------------------ ANNEXURE A1 : A TRUE COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.311/2010 OF KOIPURAM POLICE STATION. ANNEXURE A2 : A TRUE COPY OF THE CHARGE SHEET FILED BY THE1T RESPONDENT AGAINST THE PETITIONERS. ANNEXURE A3 : A TRUE COPY OF THE FIR AND FI STATEMENT IN CRIME NO.379/2010 OF KOIPURAM POLICE STATION. ANNEXURE A4 : A TRUE COPY OF THE CHARGE SHEET IN CRIME NO.379/2010 OF KOIPURAM POLICE STATION. ANNEXURE A5 : THE JOINT AFFIDAVIT SWORN TO BY THE RESPONDENTS2TO5 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :- NIL ----------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, J.

-------------------------------- Crl.M.C. No.1647 of 2014 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 27th day of March 2014 ORDER

Petitioners are the accused in S.C.No.257/2013 pending before First Addl. Sessions Court, Pathanamthitta. The offences alleged against them are punishable under Secs.326 and 308 r/w 34 of IPC. The injured/aggrieved parties are arrayed as respondents 2 to 5. They are represented by their counsel. Annexure A5 - joint affidavit has been filed by respondents 2 to 5 stating that the entire matter has been talked over and amicably settled. There is a counter case pending before CJM Court, Pathanamthitta as C.C.No.166/2010. It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for both sides that, that case also has been settled out of court. Parties are neighbours and so, in order to maintain harmony and peace, it is just and proper that both cases may be allowed to be disposed of as settled, it is submitted. Hence, in the light of the settlement so arrived at, this Crl.M.C. is allowed. Further proceedings against these petitioners in S.C.No.257/2013 pending before First Addl. Sessions Court, Pathanamthitta is quashed. Sd/- N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, J UDGE. Jvt

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2014 Same Parties Hareesh vs The State of Kerala Same Subject Education Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice N.K.Balakrishnan