During the Course of Arguments the Learned Counsel for Vs. Maninder Singh

During the Course of Arguments the Learned Counsel for vs Maninder Singh

Type Court Judgment Court Punjab and Haryana Decided Mar 12, 2014

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1133502

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1133502
Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Decided On: Mar 12, 2014
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

During the Course of Arguments the Learned Counsel for

Respondent

Maninder Singh

Excerpt

.....singh and others ...petitioners versus maninder singh ...respondent coram: hon'ble mr.justice dr.bharat bhushan parsoon present: mr.a.s.jatana, advocate for the petitioners.mr.p.s.khurana, advocate for the respondent. **** dr.bharat bhushan parsoon, j. (oral) 1. the present petition has been filed under section 407 read with section 482 of the code of criminal procedure for transfer of the criminal complaint no.24/1 dated 4.6.2007 (annexure p-1) titled “maninder singh versus kulwant singh and ors”., from the court of judicial magistrate ist class, ludhiana to the competent court of jurisdiction at barnala. 2. during the cours.of arguments, the learned counsel for respondent states that the above-said complaint is fixed for examination of complainant for 14.3.2014 and he has no objection for transfer of the case from ludhiana to sangrur but after 14.3.2014, which is accepted by the learned counsel for the petitioners.3. keeping in view the above situation, this court feels that the ends of justice would be squarely met, if the proposal put-forth by the parties is accepted and the criminal complaint no.24/1 dated 4.6.2007 is transferred to the court of competent jurisdiction at sangrur after conduct of proceedings i.e.completion of examination of the complainant on 14.3.2014. 4. ordered accordingly. mohan brij 2014.03.14 10:25 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh crm-m-38635 of 2012 -2 - 5. thereafter, the sessions judge, ludhiana is directed to send the case file to the sessions judge, sangrur, who shall entrust the same to the court of competent jurisdiction for disposal in accordance with law. the entire record then be sent to sessions judge, sangrur. 6. petition stands disposed of in the above terms.march 12th, 2014 (dr.bharat bhushan parsoon) brij judge mohan brij 2014.03.14 10:25 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh

Full Judgment

CRM-M-38635 of 2012 -1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-38635 of 2012 Date of decision: 12th March, 2014 Kulwant Singh and others ...Petitioners Versus Maninder Singh ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DR.BHARAT BHUSHAN PARSOON Present: Mr.A.S.Jatana, Advocate for the petitioneRs.Mr.P.S.Khurana, Advocate for the respondent.

**** Dr.Bharat Bhushan Parsoon, J.

(Oral) 1.

The present petition has been filed under Section 407 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for transfer of the Criminal Complaint No.24/1 dated 4.6.2007 (Annexure P-1) titled “Maninder Singh Versus Kulwant Singh and ors”., from the Court of Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Ludhiana to the competent Court of jurisdiction at Barnala.

During the couRs.of arguments, the learned counsel for respondent states that the above-said complaint is fixed for examination of complainant for 14.3.2014 and he has no objection for transfer of the case from Ludhiana to Sangrur but after 14.3.2014, which is accepted by the learned counsel for the petitioneRs.3.

Keeping in view the above situation, this Court feels that the ends of justice would be squarely met, if the proposal put-forth by the parties is accepted and the Criminal Complaint No.24/1 dated 4.6.2007 is transferred to the court of competent jurisdiction at Sangrur after conduct of proceedings i.e.completion of examination of the complainant on 14.3.2014.

Ordered accordingly.

Mohan Brij 2014.03.14 10:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRM-M-38635 of 2012 -2 - 5.

Thereafter, the Sessions Judge, Ludhiana is directed to send the case file to the Sessions Judge, Sangrur, who shall entrust the same to the court of competent jurisdiction for disposal in accordance with law.

The entire record then be sent to Sessions Judge, Sangrur.

Petition stands disposed of in the above terMs.March 12th, 2014 (DR.BHARAT BHUSHAN PARSOON) Brij JUDGE Mohan Brij 2014.03.14 10:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

Same Court & Year Punjab and Haryana · 2014 Same Parties During the Course of Arguments the Learned Counsel for vs Man... Same Subject Education