Appellant Vs. Respondent

Appellant vs Respondent

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Mar 10, 2014

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1133144

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1133144
Court: Kolkata High Court
Judge: I. P. Mukerji
Decided On: Mar 10, 2014
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Appellant

Respondent

Excerpt

.....solely on the ground that the executor had allegedly not completed administration of the estate. according to mr.ghosh, the executor has filed the inventory and accounts in this court. i think joint administrators should be appointed by this court to complete its administration in terms of the will, if not completed earlier, within six months from date. if administration has been completed, the joint administrators will record so in a report. the report recording completion of administration or confirmation that administration stands completed should be filed in this court by 29th september, 2014. mr.nilendu bhattacharya, advocate and a member of bar library club and mr.tapan coomer dey, advocate, 1st floor, room no.17 of 7 old post office street, kolkata 700 001 are appointed as joint administrators at a consolidated remuneration of rs.20,000/- each to be paid by mr.ghosh’s client and the widow of late susnata mukherjee in equal shares. the applications ga no.2596 of 2013 and ga no.72 of 2011 are disposed of by this order. urgent certified photocopy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities. (i. cs. a.r.(cr).p.mukerji, j.)

Full Judgment

ORDER

SHEET GA No.2596 of 2013 PLA No.77 of 1994 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Testamentary and Intestate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE IN THE GOODS MAYAMOYEE DEVI(DECEASED) And Re: SMT.

BELA MUKHERJEE BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE I.P.MUKERJ.Date : 10th March, 2014.

Appearance: Mr.P.Mitra, Adv.Ms.Piyali Mitra, Adv.Mr.Sounak Ghosh, Adv.The Court :- Probate of the Will was granted long ago on 17th April, 1994.

The executor and beneficiary was the elder son of the testatrix, Hemanta Kumar Mukherjee.

The Will had another beneficiary being Susnata Mukherjee the younger son.

Susnata died on 15th November, 1995.

The probate of the Will was granted by this Court, without any contest.

However, the executor allegedly did not succeed in completing administration of the estate by distributing the same to the beneficiaries.

This allegation is made in an application for revocation of the grant (GA No.72 of 2011) filed by the widow of late Susnata Mukherjee.

Hemanta Kumar Mukherjee died on 14th January, 2014.

In my opinion, there is no point in keeping these two applications pending.

The probate was uncontested.

The application for revocation of the grant was made solely on the ground that the executor had allegedly not completed administration of the estate.

According to Mr.Ghosh, the executor has filed the inventory and accounts in this Court.

I think Joint Administrators should be appointed by this Court to complete its administration in terms of the Will, if not completed earlier, within six months from date.

If administration has been completed, the Joint Administrators will record so in a report.

The report recording completion of administration or confirmation that administration stands completed should be filed in this Court by 29th September, 2014.

Mr.Nilendu Bhattacharya, Advocate and a member of Bar Library Club and Mr.Tapan Coomer Dey, Advocate, 1st floor, Room No.17 of 7 Old Post Office Street, Kolkata 700 001 are appointed as Joint Administrators at a consolidated remuneration of Rs.20,000/- each to be paid by Mr.Ghosh’s client and the widow of late Susnata Mukherjee in equal shares.

The applications GA No.2596 of 2013 and GA No.72 of 2011 are disposed of by this order.

Urgent certified photocopy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.

(I.

cs.

A.R.(CR).P.MUKERJI, J.)

Same Court & Year Kolkata · 2014 Same Parties Appellant vs Respondent Same Subject Education Same Judge I. P. Mukerji