Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sanal Kumar Vs. State of Kerala

Sanal Kumar vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Feb 28, 2014
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1133110

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sanal Kumar

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....of nileswaram police station for expert analysis to the chemical laboratory of the mining and geology dept. of the government of kerala as expeditiously as possible and within a time framed fixed by this hon'ble court, so as to secure the ends of justice.2. direct the 3rd respondent to allow the petitioner to file an application under section 23a of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act 1957 to compound the offence if on examination by the chemical laboratory of the mining and geology department of the government of kerala it is found that the sand involved in confiscation proceedings of w.p.c.no.5790 of 2014 2 the 3rd respondent is not river sand but only ordinary sand, so as to secure the ends of justice.3. grant such other reliefs as this honourable court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case." 2. the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the only relief sought for is to cause the application submitted by the petitioner before the 3rd respondent, requesting to send the sample of the contraband articles allegedly seized from the vehicle of the petitioner for expert analysis, to be considered and disposed of within a reasonable time.3. heard the learned government pleader as well.4. considering the limited extent of relief sought for, this court does not find it necessary to adjudicate the issue on merits. the writ petition is disposed of, directing the 3rd respondent to consider the application submitted by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law, which shall be done at the earliest, at any rate within 'six weeks' from the date of w.p.c.no.5790 of 2014 3 receipt of a copy of this judgment. the petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment, along with a copy of the writ petition, before the 3rd respondent, for further steps. the writ petition is disposed of. p.r. ramachandra menon, judge sp

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON FRIDAY,THE28H DAY OF FEBRUARY20149TH PHALGUNA, 1935 WP(C).No. 5790 of 2014 (W) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- SANAL KUMAR, S/O.SHARADA, HOUSE NO.19/242, PUDUKKAI, NILESWARAM, KASARAGOD - 671 314. BY ADVS.SRI.BLAZE K.JOSE SRI.RAHUL SASI RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KASARAGOD - 671 123.

3. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KANHANGAD, KASARAGOD - 671 315.

4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NILESWARAM POLICE STATION, KANHANGAD P.O., KASARAGOD - 671 314.

5. DIRECTOR OF MINING AND GELOGY, CHEMICAL LAB, KASAVADASAPURAM, PATTOM P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 004. BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.M.J.RAJASREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON2802-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Msd. WP(C).No. 5790 of 2014 (W) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX --------------- PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1 : ATRUE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE OF THE SEIZED VEHICLE RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS: ----------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE. Msd. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.

--------------------------------------- W.P.C. No.5790 OF2014--------------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of February, 2014. JUDGMENT

The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayers : " 1. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writs, orders or directions commanding the 3rd respondent to consider the application submitted requesting the 3rd respondent to send the sample of the contraband article allegedly seized from the vehicle of the petitioner and in respect of which the 4th respondent registered Crime No.71/2014 of Nileswaram Police Station for expert analysis to the Chemical Laboratory of the Mining and Geology dept. of the Government of Kerala as expeditiously as possible and within a time framed fixed by this Hon'ble Court, so as to secure the ends of justice.

2. Direct the 3rd respondent to allow the petitioner to file an application under section 23A of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act 1957 to compound the offence if on examination by the Chemical Laboratory of the Mining and Geology Department of the Government of Kerala it is found that the sand involved in confiscation proceedings of W.P.C.No.5790 of 2014 2 the 3rd respondent is not river sand but only ordinary sand, so as to secure the ends of justice.

3. Grant such other reliefs as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case." 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the only relief sought for is to cause the application submitted by the petitioner before the 3rd respondent, requesting to send the sample of the contraband articles allegedly seized from the vehicle of the petitioner for expert analysis, to be considered and disposed of within a reasonable time.

3. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well.

4. Considering the limited extent of relief sought for, this Court does not find it necessary to adjudicate the issue on merits. The writ petition is disposed of, directing the 3rd respondent to consider the application submitted by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law, which shall be done at the earliest, at any rate within 'six weeks' from the date of W.P.C.No.5790 of 2014 3 receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment, along with a copy of the writ petition, before the 3rd respondent, for further steps. The Writ Petition is disposed of. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE sp

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial