Appellant Vs. Respondent

Appellant vs Respondent

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Mar 06, 2014

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1131800

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1131800
Court: Kolkata High Court
Judge: I. P. Mukerji
Decided On: Mar 06, 2014
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Appellant

Respondent

Excerpt

.....on all the appearing parties on usual terms on request basis. however, i record that this application was argued by mr.s.n.mitra, learned senior advocate, and ms.mukherjee, learned advocate. thereafter it was submitted by some learned counsel that copies of the application and the supplementary affidavit had not been served. list all these applications for further consideration on 14th march, 2014 when it would be open to the other appearing parties to make submissions. any party may file a short rejoinder to the application (g.a.no.453 of 2013) and the supplementary affidavit, if so desired. on the submission by mrs.sikdar, learned advocate appearing for the official liquidator, i direct the official liquidator to make an appropriate application to enable this court to pass suitable orders with regard to the civil suit filed in a learned court at barrackpore. mrs.sikdar also points out some breach which has occurred in the boundary wall of the mill. the official liquidator may take such steps as may be available to him for protection of the property of the company (in liquidation).i also record the submission of mrs.sikdar that the official liquidator has no fund in his hands and that he is defraying some expenses from the official liquidator’s establishment charges account. certified photocopy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities. (i.p.mukerji, j.) tk

Full Judgment

ORDER

SHEET CP3551997 CA3142009, CA3262009, CA1452009 CA9312010, CA10792011, CA9452011 CA8942011, CA2452012, CA4532013 CA3262009, CA8742011, IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Original Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE [WITH WP12609W)/2013].[APPELLATE SIDE MATTER].IN THE MATTER OF: GOURIPORE Co.LTD.(IN LIQUIDATION) BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE I.P.MUKERJ.Date : 6th March, 2014.

Mr.S.N.Mitra, Sr.Adv., with Ms.S.Mukherjee, Adv., for the applicants in CA4532013.

Mr.S.Mukherjee, Adv.appeaRs.Ms.R.Sikder, Adv.appears for the Official Lquidator.

Ms.Ipsita Banerjee, Adv., for Sohanlal Chandmal & Co.Mr.Amitava Ghosh, Adv., for Jupiter International Co.Mr.Sarkar, Adv.appeaRs.Mr.S.Mitra, Adv.appeaRs.Ms.S.Sanyal, Adv.for Mr.R.K.Garodia.

Ms.Manju Agarwal, Adv.appeaRs.The Court : Let a copy of this application (C.A.No.453 of 2013) along with a copy of the supplementary affidavit taken out by the applicant be served on all the appearing parties on usual terms on request basis.

However, I record that this application was argued by Mr.S.N.Mitra, learned Senior Advocate, and Ms.Mukherjee, learned Advocate.

Thereafter it was submitted by some learned counsel that copies of the application and the supplementary affidavit had not been served.

List all these applications for further consideration on 14th March, 2014 when it would be open to the other appearing parties to make submissions.

Any party may file a short rejoinder to the application (G.A.No.453 of 2013) and the supplementary affidavit, if so desired.

On the submission by MRS.Sikdar, learned Advocate appearing for the Official Liquidator, I direct the Official Liquidator to make an appropriate application to enable this Court to pass suitable orders with regard to the civil suit filed in a learned Court at Barrackpore.

MRS.Sikdar also points out some breach which has occurred in the boundary wall of the mill.

The Official Liquidator may take such steps as may be available to him for protection of the property of the company (in liquidation).I also record the submission of MRS.Sikdar that the Official Liquidator has no fund in his hands and that he is defraying some expenses from the Official Liquidator’s Establishment Charges Account.

Certified photocopy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.

(I.P.MUKERJI, J.) tk

Same Court & Year Kolkata · 2014 Same Parties Appellant vs Respondent Same Subject Education Same Judge I. P. Mukerji