Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sunil Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given By: Hon'ble Shri Justice G.S. Solanki

Sunil vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given By: Hon'ble Shri Justice G.S. Solanki

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Feb 28, 2014
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1131111

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sunil

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given By: Hon'ble Shri Justice G.S. Solanki

Excerpt

.....the trial said to have been initiated on her report therefore, she committed the suicide. learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant has been falsely implicated in the case. it is further submitted that though suresh, father of prosecutrix alleged in this case that deceased was under pressure due to aforesaid incident and applicant pressurizing her to change the statement but suresh himself has not stated anything in the trial. if such was the truthful story then certainly he may state something before the trial court. suresh has not supported the prosecution case in that case and declared hostile. trial would take considerable time to be disposed of finally therefore, he prays for bail to the applicant. learned counsel for the state opposes the application. on due consideration of the facts and contention raised on behalf of the parties, i am of the considered view that it is a fit case to release the applicant on bail. therefore, without commenting on the merit of the case, this application is allowed and it is directed that applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in a sum of rs.30,000/- (rupees thirty thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of committal court/trial court for securing his presence before the said court on all the dates of hearing fixed in this regard during trial. certified copy as per rules. (g.s.solanki) judge navin

Full Judgment

M.Cr.C.No.2939/2014 28/02/2014 Shri B.J.Chourasiya, Advocate for the applicant.

Shri Rajnish Choubey, PL for the respondent/State.

Heard finally.

This is the fiRs.application filed by applicant under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C for grant of bail.

Applicant has been arrested on 10/02/2014 in connection with Crime No.15/2014 registered at P.S.Tendukheda, District Narsinghpur for the offence punishable under section 306/34 of IPC.

As per prosecution it is alleged against this applicant that he pressurized the deceased Rajeshwari to change her statement before the trial Court in the trial said to have been initiated on her report therefore, she committed the suicide.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant has been falsely implicated in the case.

It is further submitted that though Suresh, father of prosecutrix alleged in this case that deceased was under pressure due to aforesaid incident and applicant pressurizing her to change the statement but Suresh himself has not stated anything in the trial.

If such was the truthful story then certainly he may state something before the trial Court.

Suresh has not supported the prosecution case in that case and declared hostile.

Trial would take considerable time to be disposed of finally therefore, he prays for bail to the applicant.

Learned counsel for the State opposes the application.

On due consideration of the facts and contention raised on behalf of the parties, I am of the considered view that it is a fit case to release the applicant on bail.

Therefore, without commenting on the merit of the case, this application is allowed and it is directed that applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in a sum of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of committal Court/trial Court for securing his presence before the said Court on all the dates of hearing fixed in this regard during trial.

Certified copy as per rules.

(G.S.Solanki) Judge navin

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial