Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Vs. Sri Choudeshwari Associates Pvt. Ltd. and anr.Respondent/Ju

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Feb 24, 2014
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1128630

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kolkata High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Respondent

Sri Choudeshwari Associates Pvt. Ltd. and anr.Respondent/Ju

Excerpt

.....biswanath somadder date : 24th february, 2014. for petitioner/decree holder : mr.swatarup banerjee, adv.this application has been taken out by the award holder praying, inter alia, for confirmation of the sale of assets in terms of prayer (b) of the tabular statement and also for direction upon the learned receiver to hand over the sale proceeds to the petitioner in protanto satisfaction of the awarded amount in terms of prayer (d) of the tabular statement. perusing the present application it appears that an offer of rs.30,00,000/- has been made by one, n. rajeeva in terms of his letter dated 20th december, 2013, being annexure ‘j’ at page 79 of the present application. it further appears that the offerer has also furnished a bank draft amounting to rs.5,00,000/- in favour of the learned receiver. considering the facts and circumstances of the instant case, there is no reason as to why the sale of the assets should not be confirmed in terms of prayer (b).as such there shall be an order in terms of prayer (b).after confirmation of sale of assets, the learned receiver is directed to hand over the sale proceeds to the petitioner in protanto satisfaction of the awarded amount in terms of prayer (d) of the tabular statement. for the purpose of carrying out the directions contained in this order, it shall be open to the learned receiver to appoint an agent in such manner and in such terms as the learned receiver may deem fit and proper. the learned receiver shall be entitled to a further remuneration of 1200 gms., which he may deduct from the sale proceeds. let this matter appear under the same heading for further consideration three weeks hence. urgent certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities. (biswanath somadder, j.) k. banerjee a.r.[c.r.].

Full Judgment

ORDER

SHEET E.C.No.90 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE SREI EQUIPMENT FINANCE LIMITED Versus Sr.CHOUDESHWARI ASSOCIATES PVT.LTD.& ANR.

Petitioner/Decree Holder Respondent/Judgement Debtors BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE BISWANATH SOMADDER Date : 24th February, 2014.

For Petitioner/Decree Holder : Mr.Swatarup Banerjee, Adv.This application has been taken out by the award holder praying, inter alia, for confirmation of the sale of assets in terms of prayer (b) of the tabular statement and also for direction upon the learned Receiver to hand over the sale proceeds to the petitioner in protanto satisfaction of the awarded amount in terms of prayer (d) of the tabular statement.

Perusing the present application it appears that an offer of Rs.30,00,000/- has been made by one, N.

Rajeeva in terms of his letter dated 20th December, 2013, being annexure ‘J’ at page 79 of the present application.

It further appears that the offerer has also furnished a bank draft amounting to Rs.5,00,000/- in favour of the learned Receiver.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the instant case, there is no reason as to why the sale of the assets should not be confirmed in terms of prayer (b).As such there shall be an order in terms of prayer (b).After confirmation of sale of assets, the learned Receiver is directed to hand over the sale proceeds to the petitioner in protanto satisfaction of the awarded amount in terms of prayer (d) of the tabular statement.

For the purpose of carrying out the directions contained in this order, it shall be open to the learned Receiver to appoint an agent in such manner and in such terms as the learned Receiver may deem fit and proper.

The learned Receiver shall be entitled to a further remuneration of 1200 GMs., which he may deduct from the sale proceeds.

Let this matter appear under the same heading for further consideration three weeks hence.

Urgent certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.

(BISWANATH SOMADDER, J.) K.

Banerjee A.R.[C.R.].

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial