Full Judgment
3. The claim made in the appeal memorandum is that the plugs and rods are not Tool Tips but that they perform dual function namely to form wear resisting parts of machine components and as being used as guages for measuring purposes. These bare claims however, have not been substantiated by the appellants. We observe that measuring gauges at the material time were classifiable under Tariff Item 51A and not under Tariff Item 68. Since the appellants have not shown as to how these goods formed components of machines, the claim under Tariff Item No. 68 has to be rejected for lack of substantiation.
4. The Collector has further observed that the impugned goods are made of Sintered Carbide of metals in upholding the classification under Tariff Item No. 62. The appellants have claimed that mere raw material cannot act as the guide to classification but that these goods were never known in the market as tool tips. The appellants have, however, failed to substantiate this claim by leading evidence such as certificates or affidavits from the traders indicating how these goods are sold in the market. On this count also the appellants have failed to establish their case.
5. In view of our analysis, we uphold the order of the Collector and dismiss this appeal.