Manpreet Singh and Others Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Manpreet Singh and Others vs State of Punjab and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Punjab and Haryana Decided Feb 18, 2014

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1127523

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1127523
Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Decided On: Feb 18, 2014
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Manpreet Singh and Others

Respondent

State of Punjab and Others

Excerpt

.....for ms.kiranbir kaur, advocate for respondents no.2 and 3. ******* ram chand gupta, j.(oral) the present petition has been filed under section 482 of the code of criminal procedure for quashing of fir no.133 dated 23.12.2011 (annexure p-1) under sections 406 and 498-a of indian penal code, registered at police station urban estate, patiala and all other consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise (annexure p-2).having been entered between the parties. i have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the record. it has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioners that mehta sachin 2014.02.19 10:54 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh crm m-12584 of 2013 -2- dispute between the parties was matrimonial in nature, which has since been settled due to intervention of respectable persons and relatives from both the sides. as per direction of this court, both the parties appeared before learned trial court and got their statements recorded. report has been received from learned trial court alongwith statements of the parties to the effect that the compromise is genuine one, without any pressure or coercion from any side. in appropriate cases fir can be quashed on the basis of compromise by exercising power under section 482 cr.p.c., even if the offences are not compoundable. it was so held by full bench of this court in the case of kulwinder singh v. state of punjab, 2007(3) rcr (crl.) 1052. as the dispute was matrimonial in nature which has since been settled, the present petition is allowed and the impugned fir no.133 dated 23.12.2011 (annexure p-1) under sections 406 and 498-a of indian penal code, registered at police station urban estate, patiala alongwith all consequential proceedings qua petitioners manpreet singh, ajmer singh and gurtej singh is, hereby, quashed. ( ram chand gupta ) february 18, 2014. judge sachin m. mehta sachin 2014.02.19 10:54 i attest to the accuracy and.....

Full Judgment

CRM M-12584 of 2013 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

Crl.

Misc.

No.M-12584 of 2013 (O&M) Date of Decision: February 18, 2014.

Manpreet Singh and others .......PETITIONER(s).VERSUS State of Punjab and others .....RESPONDENT(s).CORAM:- HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.L.S.Sidhu, Advocate for Mr.H.S.Deol, Advocate for the petitioner (s).Dr.

Deipa Singh, Addl.A.G., Punjab.

Mr.Kulwinder Singh, Advocate for Ms.Kiranbir Kaur, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3.

******* RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing of FIR No.133 dated 23.12.2011 (Annexure P-1) under Sections 406 and 498-A of Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station Urban Estate, Patiala and all other consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise (Annexure P-2).having been entered between the parties.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the record.

It has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioners that Mehta Sachin 2014.02.19 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH CRM M-12584 of 2013 -2- dispute between the parties was matrimonial in nature, which has since been settled due to intervention of respectable persons and relatives from both the sides.

As per direction of this Court, both the parties appeared before learned trial Court and got their statements recorded.

Report has been received from learned trial Court alongwith statements of the parties to the effect that the compromise is genuine one, without any pressure or coercion from any side.

In appropriate cases FIR can be quashed on the basis of compromise by exercising power under Section 482 Cr.P.C., even if the offences are not compoundable.

It was so held by Full Bench of this Court in the case of Kulwinder Singh v.

State of Punjab, 2007(3) RCR (Crl.) 1052.

As the dispute was matrimonial in nature which has since been settled, the present petition is allowed and the impugned FIR No.133 dated 23.12.2011 (Annexure P-1) under Sections 406 and 498-A of Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station Urban Estate, Patiala alongwith all consequential proceedings qua petitioners Manpreet Singh, Ajmer Singh and Gurtej Singh is, hereby, quashed.

( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) February 18, 2014.

JUDGE Sachin M.

Mehta Sachin 2014.02.19 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH

Same Court & Year Punjab and Haryana · 2014 Same Parties Manpreet Singh and Others vs State of Punjab and Others Same Subject Education