Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Devarajan S. Vs. Thiruvananthapruam Corporation

Devarajan S. vs Thiruvananthapruam Corporation

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jan 24, 2014
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1126936

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Devarajan S.

Respondent

Thiruvananthapruam Corporation

Excerpt

.....this the 24th day of january, 2014 judgment this writ petition has been filed challenging ext.p6 notice issued to the petitioner and for other reliefs.2. heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents.3. ext.p6 notice has been issued by the 2nd respondent namely, the health inspector of nanthancode circle of the thiruvananthapuram municipal corporation. it is stated in the counter affidavit filed by the secretary of the municipal corporation that he has issued ext.p6 notice to the petitioner through the 2nd respondent. therefore, in effect, it is a notice issued by the secretary of the said municipal corporation. a notice issued by the secretary is appealable under section 509 of the kerala municipality act, 1994 (for short, the act). an appeal so provided is an efficacious remedy available to the petitioner. therefore, this writ petition is closed declining jurisdiction under article 226 of the constitution of india without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to file appeal against ext.p6, as provided under section 509 of the act. sd/- babu mathew p.joseph, judge av

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BABU MATHEW P.JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE24H DAY OF JANUARY20144TH MAGHA, 1935 WP(C).No. 21093 of 2011 (J) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- DEVARAJAN.S, S/O.SADANANDAN, PROPRIETOR OF HOTEL CHINNUS, KESAVADASAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADVS.SRI.SHABU SREEDHARAN SRI.C.K.PRASAD SRI.T.S.ANURAJ SRI.B.BALA PRASANNAN RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-1.

2. THE HEALTH INSPECTOR, NANTHANCODE CIRCLE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM CORPORATION-1.

3. THE REVENUE OFFICER,REVENUE DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-1. (CORRECTED AS: THE REVENUE OFFICER, REVENUE DEPARTMENT OF THIRUVANANTHAPURAM CORPORATION THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 1.) (ADDRESS OF R3 CORRECTED AS PER ORDER

DT.22.09.11 IN IA1483011. R1 TO3BY ADVS. SRI.N.NANDAKUMARA MENON (SR.) SRI.P.K.MANOJKUMAR R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.T.R.RAJESH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON2401-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 21093 of 2011 (J) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1: COPY OF THE PROPERTY TAX RECEIPT FOR THE YEAR20092010 NO. 54324 DATED2411.2009. EXHIBIT P1(a):COPY OF THE PROPERTY TAX RECEIPT FOR THE YEAR20092010 NO. 54319 DATED2411.2009. EXHIBIT P2: COPY OF THE PROPERTY TAX RECEIPT FOR THE YEAR20102011 NO. 0518739 DATED183.2011. EXHIBIT P2(a):COPY OF THE PROPERTY TAX RECEIPT FOR THE YEAR20102011 NO. 0518740 DATED183.2011. EXHIBIT P2(b):COPY OF THE PROPERTY TAX RECEIPT FOR THE YEAR20102011 NO. 518741 DATED183.2011. EXHIBIT P3: COPY OF THE LABOUR TAX RECEIPT FOR THE YEAR NO.77939 DATED32.2011. EXHIBIT4 COPY OF THE D & O LICENCE FEE RECEIPT FOR THE YEAR NO.2011 - 2012 NO.0489281 DATED242.2011. EXHIBIT P4(a):COPY OF THE D & O LICENCE FEE RECEIPT FOR THE YEAR NO.2011 - 2012 NO.0489282 DATED242.2011. EXHIBIT P4(b):COPY OF THE D & O LICENCE FEE RECEIPT FOR THE YEAR NO.2011 - 2012 NO.0489283 DATED242.2011. EXHIBIT P4(c):COPY OF THE D & O LICENCE FEE RECEIPT FOR THE YEAR NO.2011 - 2012 NO.0496584 DATED242.2011. EXHIBIT P5: COPY OF THE MONTHLY RETURN FORM SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER FOR THE MONTH OF JUNE, 2011 BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES DATED67.2011. EXHIBIT P6: COPY OF THE2D RESPONDENT ISSUED NOTICE NO.NAN1202011 DATED147.2011 TO THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P7: COPY OF THE REPLY PREPARED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE1T RESPONDENT DATED227.2011. RESPONDENT(S) EXHIBITS: /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE VPV BABU MATHEW P.JOSEPH, J.

------------------------------------ W.P.(C)No.21093 of 2011 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 24th day of January, 2014

JUDGMENT

This writ petition has been filed challenging Ext.P6 notice issued to the petitioner and for other reliefs.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

3. Ext.P6 notice has been issued by the 2nd respondent namely, the Health Inspector of Nanthancode Circle of the Thiruvananthapuram Municipal Corporation. It is stated in the counter affidavit filed by the Secretary of the Municipal Corporation that he has issued Ext.P6 notice to the petitioner through the 2nd respondent. Therefore, in effect, it is a notice issued by the Secretary of the said Municipal Corporation. A notice issued by the Secretary is appealable under Section 509 of the Kerala Municipality Act, 1994 (for short, the Act). An appeal so provided is an efficacious remedy available to the petitioner. Therefore, this writ petition is closed declining jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to file appeal against Ext.P6, as provided under Section 509 of the Act. Sd/- BABU MATHEW P.JOSEPH, JUDGE AV

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial