Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ashok Kumar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given By: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Yadav

Ashok Kumar vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given By: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Yadav

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Feb 10, 2014
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1126526

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ashok Kumar

Advocate Shri. Deepak Jain

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given By: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Yadav

Excerpt

1 w.p.no.2260/2014 w.p.no.2260/2014 10.02.2014 shri deepak jain, learned counsel for petitioner. ms.v.shrivastava, panel lawyer for respondents/state. petitioner initially appointed as shiksha karmi under the provisions of the madhya pradesh janpad panchayat shiksha karmi (recruitment and conditions of service) rules, 1998. subsequently, being absorbed as sahayak adhyapak in pursuance to the madhya pradesh adhyapak samvarg (employment and conditions of service) rules 2008 and granted regular pay-scale with effect from 01.04.2007 seeks direction to the respondents to grant regular pay-scale from the date of their initial appointment as shiksha karmi. during the cours.of submission, it is being stated by learned counsel for petitioner that similarly situated persons have approached this court vide writ petition no.602/2010(s) : mohanlal and ors.v.state of madhya pradesh decided on 22.01.2010 & writ petition no.4720/2013 : jitendra yadav v. state of madhya pradesh and these petitions were disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to file representation before appropriate authority and further direction to the appropriate authority to decide the representation within a period of six months. it is urged that similar direction may be issued in the matter. considering the submission put forth by learned counsel for petitioner and in order to maintain parity, the 2 w.p.no.2260/2014 petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file representation in respect of the grievance raised in this petition before appropriate authority within a period of 30 days from today and on receipt of such representation the authority shall dwell upon the same on merits; decide it and pass a speaking order within a period of three months from the date of receipt of such representation. it is made clear that this court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. petition is disposed of finally in above terms.certified copy as per rules. (sanjay yadav) judge anand

Full Judgment

1 W.P.No.2260/2014 W.P.No.2260/2014 10.02.2014 Shri Deepak Jain, learned counsel for petitioner.

Ms.V.Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer for respondents/State.

Petitioner initially appointed as Shiksha Karmi under the provisions of the Madhya Pradesh Janpad Panchayat Shiksha Karmi (Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1998.

Subsequently, being absorbed as Sahayak Adhyapak in pursuance to the Madhya Pradesh Adhyapak Samvarg (Employment and Conditions of service) Rules 2008 and granted regular pay-scale with effect from 01.04.2007 seeks direction to the respondents to grant regular pay-scale from the date of their initial appointment as Shiksha Karmi.

During the couRs.of submission, it is being stated by learned counsel for petitioner that similarly situated persons have approached this Court vide writ petition No.602/2010(s) : Mohanlal and ors.v.State of Madhya Pradesh decided on 22.01.2010 & writ petition No.4720/2013 : Jitendra Yadav v.

State of Madhya Pradesh and these petitions were disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to file representation before appropriate Authority and further direction to the appropriate Authority to decide the representation within a period of six months.

It is urged that similar direction may be issued in the matter.

Considering the submission put forth by learned counsel for petitioner and in order to maintain parity, the 2 W.P.No.2260/2014 petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file representation in respect of the grievance raised in this petition before appropriate Authority within a period of 30 days from today and on receipt of such representation the Authority shall dwell upon the same on merits; decide it and pass a speaking order within a period of three months from the date of receipt of such representation.

It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter.

Petition is disposed of finally in above terMs.Certified copy as per rules.

(SANJAY YADAV) JUDGE anand

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial