Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ajayan P. Vs. State of Kerala

Ajayan P. vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Feb 05, 2014
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1125583

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ajayan P.

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....307 read with sec.149 of the indian penal code, is in custody from 05.12.2013 and seeks bail.2. learned public prosecutor has opposed the application. it is submitted that on 01.12.2013 at about 3.40 p.m., the petitioner and others attacked the defacto complainant and others.3. having heard both sides i am inclined to think that further custody of the petitioner is not required for investigation purpose. hence i am inclined to grant relief to the petitioner but, subject to conditions to prevent recurrence of such incidents in future. the application is allowed as under. petitioner is granted bail in crime no.1149 of 2014 of the payyannur police station bail appl. no.756 of 2014 2 and shall be released, if not required to be detained otherwise on his executing bond for rs.25,000/- (rupees twenty five thousand only) with two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned magistrate and subject to the following conditions: (a) one of the sureties shall be a close relative of the petitioner. (b) petitioner shall report to the investigating officer on every saturday between 10.00 am and 12.00 pm for a period of two months or until filing of the final report, whichever is earlier. (c) petitioner shall report to the investigating officer as and when required for interrogation. (d) petitioner, except if necessary for compliance of conditions nos.(b) and (c) shall not, until otherwise ordered and except with the permission of the learned magistrate until bail appl. no.756 of 2014 3 committal if any, and thereafter of the principal sessions judge concerned enter korom village (unless it is to attend any court). (e) petitioner shall not get involved any offence during the period of this bail. (f) petitioner shall not intimidate or influence the witnesses. (g) in case any of condition nos(b) to (f) is violated, it is open to the investigating officer to file application before the learned magistrate/principal sessions judge as aforesaid, for cancellation.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH WEDNESDAY, THE5H DAY OF FEBRUARY201416TH MAGHA, 1935 Bail Appl..No. 756 of 2014 (D) ----------------------------------------- [CRIME NO. 1149/2013 OF PAYYANNUR POLICE STATION, KANNUR DISTRICT] .............. PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2: ------------------------------------------ AJAYAN .P., S/O.KRISHNAN, AGED36YEARS, PAVOOR HOUSE, KOORKKARA, KOROM AMSOM. BY ADVS.SRI.M.SASINDRAN, SRI.A.ARUNKUMAR. RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT/STATE: -------------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM - 682 031.

2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, (CRIME NO.1149 OF 2013 OF PAYYANNUR POLICE STATION) KANNUR DISTRICT - 670 307. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. SREEJITH. THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON0502-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Prv. THOMAS P. JOSEPH, J.

-------------------------------- Bail Appl. No.756 of 2014 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 5th day of February 2014 ORDER

Petitioner is the 2nd accused in Crime No.1149 of 2014 of the Payyannur Police station for the offences punishable under Secs.143, 147, 148, 341, 427 and 307 read with Sec.149 of the Indian Penal Code, is in custody from 05.12.2013 and seeks bail.

2. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the application. It is submitted that on 01.12.2013 at about 3.40 p.m., the petitioner and others attacked the defacto complainant and others.

3. Having heard both sides I am inclined to think that further custody of the petitioner is not required for investigation purpose. Hence I am inclined to grant relief to the petitioner but, subject to conditions to prevent recurrence of such incidents in future. The application is allowed as under. Petitioner is granted bail in Crime No.1149 of 2014 of the Payyannur Police station Bail Appl. No.756 of 2014 2 and shall be released, if not required to be detained otherwise on his executing bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty five thousand only) with two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned magistrate and subject to the following conditions: (a) One of the sureties shall be a close relative of the petitioner. (b) Petitioner shall report to the investigating officer on every Saturday between 10.00 am and 12.00 pm for a period of two months or until filing of the final report, whichever is earlier. (c) Petitioner shall report to the investigating officer as and when required for interrogation. (d) Petitioner, except if necessary for compliance of conditions nos.(b) and (c) shall not, until otherwise ordered and except with the permission of the learned magistrate until Bail Appl. No.756 of 2014 3 committal if any, and thereafter of the Principal Sessions Judge concerned enter Korom village (unless it is to attend any Court). (e) Petitioner shall not get involved any offence during the period of this bail. (f) Petitioner shall not intimidate or influence the witnesses. (g) In case any of condition nos(b) to (f) is violated, it is open to the investigating officer to file application before the learned magistrate/Principal Sessions Judge as aforesaid, for cancellation of the bail granted hereby, as held in P.K. Shaji V. State of Kerala (AIR 2006 SC100. Sd/- THOMAS P. JOSEPH JUDGE /True Copy / NS P.A. To Judge

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial