Daljit Kaur and Another Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Daljit Kaur and Another vs State of Punjab and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Punjab and Haryana Decided Feb 06, 2014

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1124701

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1124701
Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Decided On: Feb 06, 2014
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Daljit Kaur and Another

Respondent

State of Punjab and Others

Excerpt

.....to him by the petitioners.as per averments made in the petition both the petitioners are major. date of birth of petitioner no.1-daljit kaur, as per copy of passport, annexure p-1, is 05.10.1981 and date of birth of petitioner no.2 -sukhdev singh as per copy of certificate of 5th standard examination is 14.01.1982. they got married on 31.01.2014 as per certificate, annexure p3. photographs singh omkar 2014.02.06 15:10 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document high court, chandigarh crm no.m-4623 of 2014 2 of the marriage are annexure p-2. in view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and without going into the merits of the claim raised by the petitioners in the petition, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no.2 - i.e., senior superintendent of police, ferozepur to take appropriate action in accordance with law on application dated 03.02.2014 (annexure p-4) as already stated to have been moved to him by the petitioners.however, it is made clear that this order will be having no effect on the validity of alleged marriage of petitioners or on any other civil or criminal proceedings instituted against petitioner no.2 as per law. ( ram chand gupta ) february 6, 2014. judge ‘om’ singh omkar 2014.02.06 15:10 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document high court, chandigarh

Full Judgment

CRM No.M-4623 of 2014 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.

Misc.

No.M- 4623 of 2014(O&M) Date of Decision: February 6, 2014.

Daljit Kaur and another .....PETITIONER(s) Versus State of Punjab and others .....RESPONDENT (s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Petitioners in person with Mr.B.S.Seemar, Advocate, for the petitioneRs.***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) Heard.

Learned counsel for the petitioners states that petitioners will be satisfied if Senior Superintendent of Police, Ferozepur i.e., respondent No.2 is directed to take appropriate action in accordance with law on application dated 03.02.2014 (Annexure P-4).made to him by the petitioneRs.As per averments made in the petition both the petitioners are major.

Date of birth of petitioner No.1-Daljit Kaur, as per copy of Passport, Annexure P-1, is 05.10.1981 and date of birth of petitioner No.2 -Sukhdev Singh as per copy of certificate of 5th Standard Examination is 14.01.1982.

They got married on 31.01.2014 as per Certificate, Annexure P3.

Photographs Singh Omkar 2014.02.06 15:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh CRM No.M-4623 of 2014 2 of the marriage are Annexure P-2.

In view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and without going into the merits of the claim raised by the petitioners in the petition, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2 - i.e., Senior Superintendent of Police, Ferozepur to take appropriate action in accordance with law on application dated 03.02.2014 (Annexure P-4) as already stated to have been moved to him by the petitioneRs.However, it is made clear that this order will be having no effect on the validity of alleged marriage of petitioners or on any other civil or criminal proceedings instituted against petitioner no.2 as per law.

( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) February 6, 2014.

JUDGE ‘om’ Singh Omkar 2014.02.06 15:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh

Same Court & Year Punjab and Haryana · 2014 Same Parties Daljit Kaur and Another vs State of Punjab and Others Same Subject Land Acquisition