Govind Singh Vs. State of Raj

Govind Singh vs State of Raj

Type Court Judgment Court Rajasthan Jodhpur Decided Feb 05, 2014

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1124422

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1124422
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur High Court
Decided On: Feb 05, 2014
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Govind Singh

Respondent

State of Raj

Excerpt

.....in its meeting dated 29.08.2013 considered case of the petitioner, but denied the parole by relying upon the reports submitted by the [2].superintendent of police, jhunjhunu and the assistant director, department of social justice and empowerment, jhunjhunu. the superintendent of police, jhunjhunu by a letter dated 27.08.2013 communicated that the petitioner is facing several other criminal cases and in the event of grant of parole to him, he may cause some undesirable incident. reference of the cases pending against him is also given by the superintendent of police in an another communication dated 19.01.2014. the assistant director, department of social justice and empowerment, jhunjhunu while marking advers.remarks stated that close relatives of the convict-prisoner are also not interested in getting him released on parole for certain obvious reasons. having considered all facts relevant, we are of the opinion that the district parole advisory committee has not committed any wrong in denying parole to the petitioner at this stage. the writ petition, therefore, is dismissed. the petitioner, however, shall be at liberty to move an application afresh for granting firs.regular parole as per the provisions of the rajasthan prisoners release on parole rules, 1958 after 15.04.2014. [atul kumar jain]., j. [govind mathur]., j. pramod

Full Judgment

[1].IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER

D.B.CIVIL WRIT (PAROLE) PETITION NO.13630/2013 Govind Singh Versus The State of Rajasthan & ORS.Date of Order :: 05.02.2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE ATUL KUMAR JAIN By post Mr.K.R.Bishnoi - Additional Government Advocate BY THE COURT : A letter addressed to this court by convict-prisoner Govind Singh S/o Ummed Singh is treated as a petition for writ.

The convict-prisoner is undergoing life term imprisonment in pursuant to the judgment dated 12.03.2010 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track).Jhunjhunu in Sessions Case No.68/2008 pertaining to the offences punishable under Section 302, 366, 376 and 363 IPC.

The petitioner has already served sentence for a period of 6 years 3 months 3 day including remission for a period of 7 months 24 days as on 20.11.2013.

The District Parole Advisory Committee, Jhunjhunu in its meeting dated 29.08.2013 considered case of the petitioner, but denied the parole by relying upon the reports submitted by the [2].Superintendent of Police, Jhunjhunu and the Assistant Director, Department of Social Justice and Empowerment, Jhunjhunu.

The Superintendent of Police, Jhunjhunu by a letter dated 27.08.2013 communicated that the petitioner is facing several other criminal cases and in the event of grant of parole to him, he may cause some undesirable incident.

Reference of the cases pending against him is also given by the Superintendent of Police in an another communication dated 19.01.2014.

The Assistant Director, Department of Social Justice and Empowerment, Jhunjhunu while marking adveRs.remarks stated that close relatives of the convict-prisoner are also not interested in getting him released on parole for certain obvious reasons.

Having considered all facts relevant, we are of the opinion that the District Parole Advisory Committee has not committed any wrong in denying parole to the petitioner at this stage.

The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed.

The petitioner, however, shall be at liberty to move an application afresh for granting fiRs.regular parole as per the provisions of the Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Rules, 1958 after 15.04.2014.

[ATUL KUMAR JAIN]., J.

[GOVIND MATHUR]., J.

Pramod

Same Court & Year Rajasthan Jodhpur · 2014 Same Parties Govind Singh vs State of Raj Same Subject Education