Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sunilal Vs. State of Kerala

Sunilal vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jan 30, 2014
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1123714

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sunilal

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....308 and 153 r/w. sec. 149 of the penal code, are in custody from 17.01.2014 and seek bail.2. learned public prosecutor has opposed the application. it is submitted that on on 12.01.2014 at about 10:30 p.m. the petitioner and others attacked the de facto complainant and others due to political enemity. the first petitioner/first accused is involved in crime no. 119 of 2013 of the same station.3. learned counsel submits that further detention of the petitioner is not required.4. on hearing both sides, it is revealed that the weapons (allegedly) used by the petitioners 1 and 4 are b.a no. 609 of 2014 2 recovered. in that view of the matter, i am inclined to grant bail but subject to conditions and from a future date since investigation is not completed. application is allowed as under: petitioners are granted bail in crime no.46 of 2014 of the kollam west police station and shall be released, if not required to be detained otherwise on their executing bond for rs.25,000/- (rupees twenty five thousand only) each with two sureties each for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional magistrate and subject to the following conditions:- a) one of the sureties shall be a close relative of any of the petitioners. b) petitioners shall report to the investigating officer on every saturday between 04:00 p.m. and 05:00 p.m. until filing of the final report. c) petitioners shall report to the investigating officer as and when required for interrogation. d) petitioners shall not get involved in any offence during the period of this bail. e) petitioners shall not intimidate/influence the witnesses. e) it is made clear that in case any of condition nos. b.a no. 609 of 2014 3 (b) to (e) is violated, it is open to the investigating officer to seek cancellation of the bail granted hereby by moving application before the learned magistrate (until committal if any and threafter before the learned principal sessions judge concerned) as held in p.k. shaji v. state of.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH THURSDAY, THE30H DAY OF JANUARY201410TH MAGHA, 1935 Bail Appl..No. 609 of 2014 ------------------------------------ CRIME NO. 46/2014 OF KOLLAM WEST POLICE STATION , KOLLAM DISTRICT. ------------- PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO1TO3& 5: -------------------------------------------------------- 1. SUNILAL @ CHANTHAKKADAN SUNI, AGED32YEARS, S/O.SANKARAN NAIR, RESIDING AT RENTED BUILDING KUALTHINTE - KIZHAKKATHIL VEEDU, VIVEKANANDA NAGAR78 MAMOOTTIL KADAVU, KUREEPPUZHA CHERRY, KOLLAM WEST VILLAGE, FROM MATTATHUVADAKKATHIL VEEDU, KUREEPPUZHA CHERRY, SAKTHIKULANGARA VILLAGE.

2. SAJI @ SAJIKUMAR, AGED24YEARS, S/O.CHANDRAN PILLA, KULATHINTE KIZHAKETHIL VEEDU, VIVEKANANDA NAGAR83 MAMOOTTIKADAVU, KUREEPPUZHA CHERRY, KOLLAM WEST VILLAGE.

3. SUMESH, AGED21YEARS, S/O.SUDARSANAN, NOW RESIDING AT RENTED BUILDING ,KAVILAYIL VEEDU, VIVEKANANDA NAGAR52 KURREEPPUZHA CHERRY, KOLLAM WEST VILLAGE FROM PARAMBIL KIZHAKKETHIL VEEDU, NEAR MANILIL TEMPLE, KUREEPUZHA CHERRY, KOLLAM WEST VILLAGE.

4. ANANTHU @ ANANTHAKRISHNAN, AGED22YEARS, VAZHAPPALLI KIZHAKKATHIL VEEDU, M.G.NAGAR - 56, MAMOOTTIKADAVU, KUREEPUZHA CHERRY, KOLLAM BY ADVS.SRI.C.RAJENDRAN SRI.K.R.RANJITH RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT: -------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.LALIZA. THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON3001-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Msd. THOMAS P. JOSEPH, J.

========================= Bail Application No. 609 of 2014 ============================ Dated this the 30th day of January, 2014 ORDER

Petitioners are accused 1 to 3 and 5 in Crime No.46 of 2014 of the Kollam West police station for the offences punishable under Secs.143, 147, 148, 294(b), 341, 324, 308 and 153 r/w. Sec. 149 of the Penal Code, are in custody from 17.01.2014 and seek bail.

2. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the application. It is submitted that on on 12.01.2014 at about 10:30 p.m. the petitioner and others attacked the de facto complainant and others due to political enemity. The first petitioner/first accused is involved in Crime No. 119 of 2013 of the same station.

3. Learned counsel submits that further detention of the petitioner is not required.

4. On hearing both sides, it is revealed that the weapons (allegedly) used by the petitioners 1 and 4 are B.A No. 609 of 2014 2 recovered. In that view of the matter, I am inclined to grant bail but subject to conditions and from a future date since investigation is not completed. Application is allowed as under: Petitioners are granted bail in Crime No.46 of 2014 of the Kollam West police station and shall be released, if not required to be detained otherwise on their executing bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty five thousand only) each with two sureties each for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional magistrate and subject to the following conditions:- a) One of the sureties shall be a close relative of any of the petitioners. b) Petitioners shall report to the Investigating Officer on every Saturday between 04:00 p.m. and 05:00 p.m. until filing of the final report. c) Petitioners shall report to the investigating officer as and when required for interrogation. d) Petitioners shall not get involved in any offence during the period of this bail. e) Petitioners shall not intimidate/influence the witnesses. e) It is made clear that in case any of condition Nos. B.A No. 609 of 2014 3 (b) to (e) is violated, it is open to the Investigating Officer to seek cancellation of the bail granted hereby by moving application before the learned magistrate (until committal if any and threafter before the learned Principal Sessions Judge concerned) as held in P.K. Shaji V. State of Kerala (AIR2006 Supreme Court 100). f) Since investigation is not completed, this order granting bail will take effect only from 04.02.2014. Sd/- THOMAS P.JOSEPH, JUDGE //true copy// P.A. to Judge Smv

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial