Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Lal Vs. State of Kerala

Lal vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jan 24, 2014
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1122906

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Lal

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....of 2014 --------------------------------------- dated this the 24th day of january, 2014. order this is a petition filed under section 482 cr.p.c. seeking to have all further proceedings in crime no.1541 of 2013 of sreekaryam police station quashed.2. the petitioners are accused of having committed offences punishable under sections 143,144,147,323,452,294(b),354,427 read with section 149 ipc and section 27 of arms act.3. it is unnecessary to go into the facts in detail for the simple reason that this petition can be disposed of on a short ground.4. the petitioners have impleaded the defacto complainant and the injured as respondents 2 and 3, who have entered appearance through a counsel. the counsel so engaged by respondents 2 and 3 stated that annexures-b and c affidavits filed along with the petition are sworn to by respondents 2 and 3 and that they stand by the statements contained therein.5. on going through the affidavits, it is seen that the parties have settled the disputes between them and no further dispute remains to be resolved. it is further seen from the affidavits that crl. m.c. no.913 of 2014 2 neither the defacto complainant nor the injured is interested in prosecuting the matter further. there is no social or public issue involved in the matter and it is purely a personal issue between the two parties.6. in the light of the above stand taken by the defacto complainant and the injured, it is felt that further continuance of proceedings will only be an exercise in futility. in the result, this petition is allowed and all further proceedings in crime no.1541 of 2013 of sreekaryam police station including the registration of the fir shall stand quashed and the proceedings as against the petitioners shall stand dropped. p. bhavadasan, judge sp

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN FRIDAY, THE24H DAY OF JANUARY20144TH MAGHA, 1935 Crl.MC.No. 913 of 2014 () -------------------------- CRIME NO. 1541/2013 OF SREEKARYAM POLICE STATION , THIRUVANANDAPURAM PETITIONERS/A1 & A2: ------------------------------- 1. LAL, AGED38YEARS S/O. THANKAPPAN, CHITHAMBARAVILAKOM, MULLUVILA KAZHAKKUTTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

2. RAJESH @ PUTHENPALAM RAJESH, AGED37YEARS S/O.SASI, KALLOOR THOTTUVARAMBIL VEEDU, KANNANMOOLA THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.SHAJIN S.HAMEED RESPONDENTS/STATE, DE FACTO COMPLAINANT & INJURED: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE SREEKARYAM POLICE STATION REPRESENTED THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

2. N.CHANDRIKA , AGED47YEARS D/O. JANAMMA, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT F-29 UNIVERSITY CAMPUS QUARTERS, KARYAVATTOM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PERMANENTLY RESIDING AT SANTHOSH BHAVAN NEAR T.V.JUNCTION, HARIPPAD, ALAPPUZHA-690 514.

3. RENJITH S/O. CHANDRIKA, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT F-29 UNIVERSITY CAMPUS QUARTERS, KARYAVATTOM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PERMANENTLY RESIDING AT SANTHOSH BHAVAN NEAR T.V.JUNCTION, HARIPPAD ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-690 514. R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. DHANESH MATHEW MANJOORAN R2 & 3 BY ADV. SRI. A.K. RAJESH THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON2401- 2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Crl.MC.No. 913 of 2014 () APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS:- ----------------------------------- ANNEXURE A : COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.1541/2013 OF SREEKARYAM POLICE STATION. ANNEXURE B : NOTARIZED AFFIDAVIT EXECUTED BY THE2D RESPONDENT. ANNEXURE : NOTARIZED AFFIDAVIT EXECUTED BY THE3D RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:- NIL -------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE sp P. BHAVADASAN, J.

--------------------------------------- Crl. M.C. No.913 of 2014 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 24th day of January, 2014. ORDER

This is a petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to have all further proceedings in Crime No.1541 of 2013 of Sreekaryam Police Station quashed.

2. The petitioners are accused of having committed offences punishable under Sections 143,144,147,323,452,294(b),354,427 read with Section 149 IPC and Section 27 of Arms Act.

3. It is unnecessary to go into the facts in detail for the simple reason that this petition can be disposed of on a short ground.

4. The petitioners have impleaded the defacto complainant and the injured as respondents 2 and 3, who have entered appearance through a counsel. The counsel so engaged by respondents 2 and 3 stated that Annexures-B and C affidavits filed along with the petition are sworn to by respondents 2 and 3 and that they stand by the statements contained therein.

5. On going through the affidavits, it is seen that the parties have settled the disputes between them and no further dispute remains to be resolved. It is further seen from the affidavits that Crl. M.C. No.913 of 2014 2 neither the defacto complainant nor the injured is interested in prosecuting the matter further. There is no social or public issue involved in the matter and it is purely a personal issue between the two parties.

6. In the light of the above stand taken by the defacto complainant and the injured, it is felt that further continuance of proceedings will only be an exercise in futility. In the result, this petition is allowed and all further proceedings in Crime No.1541 of 2013 of Sreekaryam Police Station including the registration of the FIR shall stand quashed and the proceedings as against the petitioners shall stand dropped. P. BHAVADASAN, JUDGE sp

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial