Damanjit Singh Slatch and Another Vs. State of U.T. and Others

Damanjit Singh Slatch and Another vs State of U.T. and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Punjab and Haryana Decided Jan 20, 2014

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1122641

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1122641
Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Decided On: Jan 20, 2014
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Damanjit Singh Slatch and Another

Respondent

State of U.T. and Others

Excerpt

.....qua respondents no.4 to 6. learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the petitioners would be satisfied if senior superintendent of police, chandigarh - respondent no.2 is directed to look into the representation dated 17.12.2013 (annexure p-4) already moved by the petitioners in this behalf (duly supported by certificate of marriage, birth certificates of petitioners no.1 and 2 respectively showing that they were major on the date of their alleged marriage).kadyan vinod kumar 2014.01.21 16:22 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh crm no.m-1934 of 2014 (o&m) -: 2 :- without commenting anything on the merits of the petition, respondent no.2 is directed to consider request for providing protection and commensurate security as per law made in the representation (annexure p- 4).stated to have already been moved by the petitioners before him. present petition is disposed of accordingly. however, it is made clear that this order will have no effect on the validity or otherwise of marriage or on civil or criminal proceedings, if any, instituted qua this marriage. [dr. bharat bhushan parsoon].january 20, 2014. judge kadyan kadyan vinod kumar 2014.01.21 16:22 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh

Full Judgment

CRM No.M-1934 of 2014 (O&M) -: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-1934 of 2014 (O&M) Date of decision: January 20, 2014.

Damanjit Singh Slatch and another ..Petitioners v.

State of U.T.and others ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE DR.

BHARAT BHUSHAN PARSOON Present: Shri Jatinder Nagpal, Advocate, for the petitioneRs.Dr.

Bharat Bhushan Parsoon, J.

(Oral).A photocopy of the marriage certificate filed in court today, is taken on record.

The petitioneRs.claiming themselves to be major (petitioner No.1 having been born on 16.7.1987 and petitioner No.2 having been born on 21.5.1988) and averring that they got married as per certificate given by the Head Granthi of Gurdwara Dashmesh Pita Badshai 10th, Panchkula, seek protection of their life and liberty qua respondents No.4 to 6.

Learned Counsel for the petitioners contends that the petitioners would be satisfied if Senior Superintendent of Police, Chandigarh - respondent No.2 is directed to look into the representation dated 17.12.2013 (Annexure P-4) already moved by the petitioners in this behalf (duly supported by certificate of marriage, birth certificates of petitioners No.1 and 2 respectively showing that they were major on the date of their alleged marriage).Kadyan Vinod Kumar 2014.01.21 16:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRM No.M-1934 of 2014 (O&M) -: 2 :- Without commenting anything on the merits of the petition, respondent No.2 is directed to consider request for providing protection and commensurate security as per law made in the representation (Annexure P- 4).stated to have already been moved by the petitioners before him.

Present petition is disposed of accordingly.

However, it is made clear that this order will have no effect on the validity or otherwise of marriage or on civil or criminal proceedings, if any, instituted qua this marriage.

[Dr.

Bharat Bhushan Parsoon].January 20, 2014.

Judge kadyan Kadyan Vinod Kumar 2014.01.21 16:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

Same Court & Year Punjab and Haryana · 2014 Same Parties Damanjit Singh Slatch and Another vs State of U.T. and Others Same Subject Land Acquisition