Unknown Vs. Unknown

Unknown vs Unknown

Type Court Judgment Court Punjab and Haryana Decided Jan 20, 2014

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1122636

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1122636
Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Decided On: Jan 20, 2014
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Unknown

Respondent

Unknown

Excerpt

.....would be cancelled. it has, however, been stated that against 17 crushers action would be taken as there is failure to produce proper records. the second limb of the affidavit states that the demarcation of interstate boundary is in process, for which about two to three weeks would be taken. check-posts, barriers in order to check the minerals on transit as envisaged under the punjab minor minerals rules, 2013, are proposed to be established. learned additional advocate general, punjab, verma neenu 2014.01.22 16:47 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh cwp no.22405 of 2013 -2- states that as on date, infact, they stand established. the third aspect emphasised is that the department is seeking environmental clearance for the minor and mineral quarries in terms of the relevant notification and out of 27 quarries, auction has been held for 17 quarries and approvals for transfer of environmental project proponent clearance in the name of contractors have been received for 14 quarries. learned additional advocate general, punjab, on instructions, states that the remaining work would be completed within a maximum period of six weeks from today. we are, thus, of the view that no further directions are called for except for the final compliance report to be filed by the respondents, duly supported by the photographs. the petition, accordingly stands disposed of. list for compliance on 21.03.2014. (sanjay kishan kaul) chief justice2001.2014 neenu (arun palli) judge verma neenu 2014.01.22 16:47 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.22405 of 2013 (O & M) Date of Decision:20.01.2014 Court on its own motion Versus State of Punjab and others .....respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ARUN PALLI1Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement?.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?.

Present: Mr.Ashwani Talwar, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, with Mr.Sunil Kumar Vashisth, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab *** SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL).We have perused the status report in the form of affidavit of Principal Secretary, Department of Industries & Commerce, Punjab, Chandigarh, affirmed on 15.01.2014.

It is stated in the affidavit that out of 132 stone crushers against whom FIR was registered on 22.10.2013 for illegal mining, after verification of returns and evidence in the form of weighment slips submitted by stone crusheRs.the claim of 115 has been found to be correct and thus the FIR against them would be cancelled.

It has, however, been stated that against 17 crushers action would be taken as there is failure to produce proper records.

The second limb of the affidavit states that the demarcation of interstate boundary is in process, for which about two to three weeks would be taken.

Check-posts, barriers in order to check the minerals on transit as envisaged under the Punjab Minor Minerals Rules, 2013, are proposed to be established.

Learned Additional Advocate General, Punjab, Verma Neenu 2014.01.22 16:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CWP No.22405 of 2013 -2- states that as on date, infact, they stand established.

The third aspect emphasised is that the Department is seeking environmental clearance for the minor and mineral quarries in terms of the relevant notification and out of 27 quarries, auction has been held for 17 quarries and approvals for transfer of environmental project proponent clearance in the name of contractors have been received for 14 quarries.

Learned Additional Advocate General, Punjab, on instructions, states that the remaining work would be completed within a maximum period of six weeks from today.

We are, thus, of the view that no further directions are called for except for the final compliance report to be filed by the respondents, duly supported by the photographs.

The petition, accordingly stands disposed of.

List for compliance on 21.03.2014.

(SANJAY KISHAN KAUL) CHIEF JUSTICE2001.2014 neenu (ARUN PALLI) JUDGE Verma Neenu 2014.01.22 16:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

Same Court & Year Punjab and Haryana · 2014 Same Parties Unknown vs Unknown Same Subject Land Acquisition