Gulshan Kumar and Others Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Gulshan Kumar and Others vs State of Haryana and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Punjab and Haryana Decided Jan 22, 2014

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1122247

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1122247
Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Decided On: Jan 22, 2014
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Gulshan Kumar and Others

Respondent

State of Haryana and Others

Excerpt

.....which have, till date, not been responded to nor any benefit granted to them. counsel for the petitioners contends that the petitioners.at this stage, would be satisfied if a direction is issued to the director, health services, haryana-respondent no.2 to consider and decide the legal notices dated 13.09.2013 (annexure p-8) and 28.12.2013 (annexure p-9) within some specified time. in the light of the above submissions of the counsel for the petitioners and without going into the merits of the case or commenting thereon, the present writ petition is disposed of with directions to the director, health services, haryana-respondent no.2 to consider and decide the legal notices dated 13.09.2013 (annexure p-8) and 28.12.2013 (annexure p-9) within a period of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. in case the claim of the petitioners is accepted, the consequential benefits, if any, be released to them, in accordance with law, within a further period of two months. petitioners shall, however, be not entitled to any arrears prior to 38 months from the date of service of the legal notices. (augustine george masih ) january 22, 2014 judge pj prerna datta 2014.01.23 11:19 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document high court, chandigarh cwp no.1027 of 2014 3 prerna datta 2014.01.23 11:19 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document high court, chandigarh

Full Judgment

CWP No.1027 of 2014 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH102CWP No.1027 of 2014 Date of Decision : January 22, 2014 Gulshan Kumar and others ...PETITIONERS versus State of Haryana and others ....RESPONDENTS CORAM : HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH Present : Mr.Vikas Chatrath, Advocate, for the petitioneRs.AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J.

(ORAL) Petitioners have approached this Court praying for stepping up of their pay at par with their junior, namely, Sh.

BanaRs.Dass Gulati along with all consequential benefits including interest in the light of the judgments of the Supreme Court in the cases of P.

Jagdish versus Union of India and otheRs.1997 (2) SCT664and Punjab State Electricity Board and others versus Gurmail Singh, 2008 (3) SCT18 It has been asserted that Sh.

BanaRs.Dass Gulati, who is junior to the petitioneRs.has been granted the benefit of higher pay scale than the petitioners and as of now he is drawing higher pay than the petitioners despite being junior to them.

Prerna datta 2014.01.23 11:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh CWP No.1027 of 2014 2 Counsel for the petitioners contends that putting forth their claim, they have served legal notices dated 13.09.2013 (Annexure P-8) and 28.12.2013 (Annexure P-9) upon the respondents, which have, till date, not been responded to nor any benefit granted to them.

Counsel for the petitioners contends that the petitioneRs.at this stage, would be satisfied if a direction is issued to the Director, Health Services, Haryana-respondent No.2 to consider and decide the legal notices dated 13.09.2013 (Annexure P-8) and 28.12.2013 (Annexure P-9) within some specified time.

In the light of the above submissions of the counsel for the petitioners and without going into the merits of the case or commenting thereon, the present writ petition is disposed of with directions to the Director, Health Services, Haryana-respondent No.2 to consider and decide the legal notices dated 13.09.2013 (Annexure P-8) and 28.12.2013 (Annexure P-9) within a period of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

In case the claim of the petitioners is accepted, the consequential benefits, if any, be released to them, in accordance with law, within a further period of two months.

Petitioners shall, however, be not entitled to any arrears prior to 38 months from the date of service of the legal notices.

(AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH ) January 22, 2014 JUDGE pj Prerna datta 2014.01.23 11:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh CWP No.1027 of 2014 3 Prerna datta 2014.01.23 11:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh

Same Court & Year Punjab and Haryana · 2014 Same Parties Gulshan Kumar and Others vs State of Haryana and Others Same Subject Education