Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Daljit Singh @ Man Vs. State of Punjab

Daljit Singh @ Man vs State of Punjab

Type Court Judgment Court Punjab and Haryana Decided Jan 22, 2014
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1122235

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Daljit Singh @ Man

Respondent

State of Punjab

Excerpt

.....the bars.he further contends that the petitioner is neither required nor involved in any other case. he also submits that in spite of several opportunities, the prosecution has not been able to lead its entire evidence, therefore, the conclusion of the trial would take sufficient long time. learned counsel for the state has not controverted the factual aspects raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner, however, submits that recovery of 80 grams of the powder allegedly recovered from the petitioner attracts the provisions of commercial quantity since the limit for non-commercial quantity of methamphetamine powder is 50 grams.i have heard the learned counsel for the parties and with their able assistance gone through the material available on record. the petitioner was allegedly arrested on 03.07.2013 and admitted to bail by the learned judge, special court, tarn taran, on 31.07.2013. during the bail period, the petitioner did not misuse the said concession. after receipt of the chemical examiner's report finding that the powder allegedly recovered from the petitioner was found to be methamphetamine, therefore, his bail was cancelled and taken into custody. the trial is proceeding at snail's pace. it would take sufficient time to conclude. sharma seema 2014.01.23 10:17 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh criminal misc.no.m-39532 of 2013 {3} without commenting much on the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed. petitioner- daljit singh @ man, s/o lakha singh s/o rattan singh, r/o dashmesh colony, tarn taran, is ordered to be released on bail during the pendency of the trial of the present case subject to his furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the learned trial court. january 21, 2014 (naresh kumar sanghi) seema judge sharma seema 2014.01.23 10:17 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh

Full Judgment

Criminal Misc.No.M-39532 of 2013 {1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.No.M-39532 of 2013 st Date of Decision: 21 January, 2014 Daljit Singh @ Man .Petitioner Versus State of Punjab .Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI Present: Mr.J.S.Virk & Mr.K.S.Sra, Advocates, for the petitioner.

Mr.K.S.Pannu, DAG, Punjab.

*** Naresh Kumar Sanghi, J.

Prayer in this petition is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner Daljit Singh alias Man who has been booked for having committed the offence punishable under Section 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, in a case arising out of FIR No.89, dated 03.04.2013, registered at Police Station, City, Tarn Taran.

Learned counsel contends that according to the prosecution, 80 grams of powder was recovered from the petitioner; that the petitioner was granted bail by the learned Judge, Special Court, Tarn Taran, on 31.07.2013; that after receipt of the report from the Chemical Examiner stating that the powder allegedly recovered from the petitioner was found to Sharma Seema 2014.01.23 10:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh Criminal Misc.No.M-39532 of 2013 {2} be methamphetamine, therefore, his bail was cancelled and he was taken into custody and since then, he is behind the baRs.He further contends that the petitioner is neither required nor involved in any other case.

He also submits that in spite of several opportunities, the prosecution has not been able to lead its entire evidence, therefore, the conclusion of the trial would take sufficient long time.

Learned counsel for the State has not controverted the factual aspects raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner, however, submits that recovery of 80 grams of the powder allegedly recovered from the petitioner attracts the provisions of commercial quantity since the limit for non-commercial quantity of methamphetamine powder is 50 graMs.I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and with their able assistance gone through the material available on record.

The petitioner was allegedly arrested on 03.07.2013 and admitted to bail by the learned Judge, Special Court, Tarn Taran, on 31.07.2013.

During the bail period, the petitioner did not misuse the said concession.

After receipt of the Chemical Examiner's report finding that the powder allegedly recovered from the petitioner was found to be methamphetamine, therefore, his bail was cancelled and taken into custody.

The trial is proceeding at snail's pace.

It would take sufficient time to conclude.

Sharma Seema 2014.01.23 10:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh Criminal Misc.No.M-39532 of 2013 {3} Without commenting much on the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed.

Petitioner- Daljit Singh @ Man, s/o Lakha Singh s/o Rattan Singh, r/o Dashmesh Colony, Tarn Taran, is ordered to be released on bail during the pendency of the trial of the present case subject to his furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court.

January 21, 2014 (Naresh Kumar Sanghi) seema Judge Sharma Seema 2014.01.23 10:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial