Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Babu Vs. Premwati Judgement Given By: Hon'ble Shri Justice Keshav Kumar Trivedi

Babu vs Premwati Judgement Given By: Hon'ble Shri Justice Keshav Kumar Trivedi

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jan 09, 2014
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1120108

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Babu

Advocate Shri. R.L.Ariha

Respondent

Premwati Judgement Given By: Hon'ble Shri Justice Keshav Kumar Trivedi

Excerpt

second appeal no.472/2011 1 09.01.2014 shri r.l.ariha, learned counsel for the appellant. heard on the question of admission. this second appeal is admitted on the following substantial questions of law : “a. whether the lower appellate court was right in reversing the judgment and decree of the trial court only on the basis of a decree passed in civil appeal no.72-a/2007 even when it was found by the lower appellate court that the present appellant was not a party in the said appeal ?.b.whether in absence of specific pleading with respect to the application of the appellate judgment passed in any proceeding in which the appellant/plaintiff was not a party, principle of estopple would be applicable against the appellant to claim any relief against the respondents/defendants ?.c.whether in absence of any counter claim, a registered sale-deed could be declared null and void even when the findings were recorded by the trial court with respect to the entitlement of plaintiff on the strength of registered sale-deed ?.” issue notices of this appeal on merits and i.a.no.5137/2011, an application under order 39 rule 1 & 2 of the code of civil procedure, to the respondents on payment of process fee within seven days by registered second appeal no.472/2011 2 a.d.as well as by ordinary mode both. the notices will contain the substantial questions of law framed by this court. notices be made returnable in six weeks. since it is the finding of the court below that the appellant is in possession of the disputed land, it is directed that till further consideration of this interim application, parties to the appeal shall maintain status quo with respect to the possession over the land in suit. list immediately after six weeks in the week commencing 10th march, 2014. certified copy as per rules. (k.k.trivedi) judge skc

Full Judgment

SECOND APPEAL No.472/2011 1 09.01.2014 Shri R.L.Ariha, learned Counsel for the appellant.

Heard on the question of admission.

This second appeal is admitted on the following substantial questions of law : “A.

Whether the lower Appellate Court was right in reversing the judgment and decree of the Trial Court only on the basis of a decree passed in Civil Appeal No.72-A/2007 even when it was found by the lower Appellate Court that the present appellant was not a party in the said appeal ?.B.Whether in absence of specific pleading with respect to the application of the appellate judgment passed in any proceeding in which the appellant/plaintiff was not a party, principle of estopple would be applicable against the appellant to claim any relief against the respondents/defendants ?.C.Whether in absence of any counter claim, a registered sale-deed could be declared null and void even when the findings were recorded by the Trial Court with respect to the entitlement of plaintiff on the strength of registered sale-deed ?.” Issue notices of this appeal on merits and I.A.No.5137/2011, an application under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to the respondents on payment of process fee within seven days by registered SECOND APPEAL No.472/2011 2 A.D.as well as by ordinary mode both.

The notices will contain the substantial questions of law framed by this Court.

Notices be made returnable in six weeks.

Since it is the finding of the Court below that the appellant is in possession of the disputed land, it is directed that till further consideration of this interim application, parties to the appeal shall maintain status quo with respect to the possession over the land in suit.

List immediately after six weeks in the week commencing 10th March, 2014.

Certified copy as per rules.

(K.K.Trivedi) Judge Skc

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial