Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Mohd. Farooq Vs. State of U.P

Mohd. Farooq vs State of U.P

Type Court Judgment Court Allahabad Decided Oct 15, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1115524

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Allahabad High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
U/S 482/378/407 No. 4037 of 2012
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 482 - Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Section 3, Section 4 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 -

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mohd. Farooq

Respondent

State of U.P

Excerpt

code of criminal procedure, 1973 - section 482 - dowry prohibition act, 1961 - section 3, section 4 - indian penal code, 1860 -1. mohd. farooq (petitioner) and mahzabeen akhtar (respondent no. 2) are present in the court. 2. this petition has been filed for quashing the proceedings of criminal appeal no. 63 of 2010, under sections 498-a, 406, 323, 504, 506 i.p.c. read with section 3/4 d.p. act (mohd. farooq vs. state of u.p.), pending before additional district and sessions judge-iv, faizabad, challenging the order dated 15.04.2010 passed by additional chief judicial magistrate/civil judge, senior division, second, faizabad in complaint case no. 476 of 2010 (smt. mahzabeen vs. mohd. farooq and others) on the ground that matter is purely personal and private in nature. number of cases are pending between the parties. parties have resolved their dispute.? a compromise was filed before the additional sessions judge-iv, faizabad. according to para-4 of the compromise, both the parties have parted with relations and decided to live separately. it has also been decided that the criminal cases pending between the parties will be withdrawn alongwith instant case. in view of the compromise, no useful purpose would be served to keep the matter pending. 3. since dispute is personal and private in nature and no morals, ethics or national interests are involved, taking a pragmatic view of the matter, in exercise of the power under section 482 cr.p.c., i quash the proceedings of criminal appeal no. 63 of 2010, under sections 498-a, 406, 323, 504, 506 i.p.c. read with section 3/4 d.p. act (mohd. farooq vs. state of u.p.), pending before additional district and sessions judge-iv, faizabad, challenging the order dated 15.04.2010 passed by additional chief judicial magistrate/civil judge, senior division, second, faizabad in complaint case no. 476 of 2010 (smt. mahzabeen vs. mohd. farooq and others). petition is accordingly allowed.

Full Judgment

1. MOHD. Farooq (petitioner) and Mahzabeen Akhtar (respondent no. 2) are present in the Court.

2. THIS petition has been filed for quashing the proceedings of Criminal Appeal No. 63 of 2010, under Sections 498-A, 406, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. read with Section 3/4 D.P. Act (Mohd. Farooq Vs. State of U.P.), pending before Additional District and Sessions Judge-IV, Faizabad, challenging the order dated 15.04.2010 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate/Civil Judge, Senior Division, second, Faizabad in Complaint Case No. 476 of 2010 (Smt. Mahzabeen Vs. Mohd. Farooq and others) on the ground that matter is purely personal and private in nature.

Number of cases are pending between the parties. Parties have resolved their dispute.? A compromise was filed before the Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Faizabad. According to Para-4 of the compromise, both the parties have parted with relations and decided to live separately. It has also been decided that the criminal cases pending between the parties will be withdrawn alongwith instant case.

In view of the compromise, no useful purpose would be served to keep the matter pending.

3. SINCE dispute is personal and private in nature and no morals, ethics or national interests are involved, taking a pragmatic view of the matter, in exercise of the power under Section 482 Cr.P.C., I quash the proceedings of Criminal Appeal No. 63 of 2010, under Sections 498-A, 406, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. read with Section 3/4 D.P. Act (Mohd. Farooq Vs. State of U.P.), pending before Additional District and Sessions Judge-IV, Faizabad, challenging the order dated 15.04.2010 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate/Civil Judge, Senior Division, second, Faizabad in Complaint Case No. 476 of 2010 (Smt. Mahzabeen Vs. Mohd. Farooq and others).

Petition is accordingly allowed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial