A.C. Raha Vs. Voltas Ltd.

A.C. Raha vs Voltas Ltd.

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi Decided May 24, 1995

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1114176

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1114176
Court: Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi
Judge: A.P. Chowdhri, President &Amp; the Honourable Ms. Justice S. Brar, Member
Decided On: May 24, 1995
Case Number: Case No. A-154 of 1995
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Section 15 - Comparative Citation: 1995 (3) CPJ 314

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

A.C. Raha

Respondent

Voltas Ltd.

Excerpt

consumer protection act, 1986 - section 15 - comparative citation: 1995 (3) cpj 314a.p. chowdhri, president: 1. the appellant purchased an air-conditioner from the respondent in may '92. the a.c. started giving unusually loud noise. ultimately on the report of the complainant the a.c. was replaced in may '93. the complainant asked for refund of rs. 4,000/- on account of excise duty and compensation on account of mental agony and harassment. all these prayers were declined by the d.f. on the ground that the a.c. has since been replaced and reduction in the excise duty at a later date did not justify refund of that amount to the complainant apparently on the ground that the excise duty collected from the complainant must have been paid to the government on account of sale of the earlier a.c. made to the complainant. we find ourselves in agreement with the order passed by the d.f. after hearing the appellant and going through the order we find that there is no merit in this appeal. it is accordingly dismissed in limine. appellant be informed. appeal dismissed in limine.

Full Judgment

A.P. Chowdhri, President:

1. The appellant purchased an air-conditioner from the respondent in May '92. The A.C. started giving unusually loud noise. Ultimately on the report of the complainant the A.C. was replaced in May '93. The complainant asked for refund of Rs. 4,000/- on account of excise duty and compensation on account of mental agony and harassment. All these prayers were declined by the D.F. on the ground that the A.C. has since been replaced and reduction in the excise duty at a later date did not justify refund of that amount to the complainant apparently on the ground that the excise duty collected from the complainant must have been paid to the Government on account of sale of the earlier A.C. made to the complainant. We find ourselves in agreement with the order passed by the D.F. After hearing the appellant and going through the order we find that there is no merit in this appeal. It is accordingly dismissed in limine. Appellant be informed.

Appeal dismissed in limine.

Same Court & Year Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New ... Same Parties A.C. Raha vs Voltas Ltd. Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge A.P. Chowdhri, President &Amp; the Honourable Ms. Justice S. ...

Land Acquisition