Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

S. Sheela Vs. the Branch Manager, Lic of India, Chennai and Another

S. Sheela vs The Branch Manager, Lic of India, Chennai and Another

Type Court Judgment Court Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai Decided Nov 04, 2008
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1111693

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
F.A. NO.579 of 2007 {Against O.P.No.167 of 2006 on the file of the DCDRF, Chennai (North)}
Subject
Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue
Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

S. Sheela

Respondent

The Branch Manager, Lic of India, Chennai and Another

Excerpt

n. kannadasan j. (open court) 1. the appellant is the complainant and the respondent is the opposite party before the district forum. 2. the above appeal is filed as against the order of the district forum in dismissing the complaint for default. in the grounds of appeal, various reasons are adduced by the appellant/complainant to set aside the order of the district forum. we are not propose to go into all those grounds. however with a view to give one more opportunity to the appellant, we are inclined to set aside the order of the district forum and the district forum is directed to take up the complaint on file and to proceed with the matter. time to dispose of the appeal is 8 weeks from the date of receipt of the order. 3. accordingly the appeal is allowed.

Full Judgment

N. KANNADASAN J. (Open Court)

1. The Appellant is the complainant and the Respondent is the opposite party before the District Forum.

2. The above appeal is filed as against the order of the District Forum in dismissing the complaint for default. In the grounds of appeal, various reasons are adduced by the Appellant/Complainant to set aside the order of the District Forum. We are not propose to go into all those grounds. However with a view to give one more opportunity to the Appellant, we are inclined to set aside the order of the District Forum and the District Forum is directed to take up the complaint on file and to proceed with the matter. Time to dispose of the appeal is 8 weeks from the date of receipt of the order.

3. Accordingly the appeal is allowed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial