Mr. Rajkumar Sharma Vs. M/S. G.H.P. Enterprises Builders and Developers and Another

Mr. Rajkumar Sharma vs M/S. G.H.P. Enterprises Builders and Developers and Another

Type Court Judgment Court Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai Decided Oct 21, 2009

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1110994

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1110994
Court: Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai
Judge: Shri P.N. Kashalkar, Honâble Presiding Judicial Member Mrs. S.P. Lale, Honâble Member
Decided On: Oct 21, 2009
Case Number: First Appeal No.881 of 2008 (In Consumer Complaint No.138 of 2004)
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mr. Rajkumar Sharma

Advocate Mr. U.B. Wavikar, Advocate for the appellant. Appellant Mr. Rajkumar Sharma also present in person. Advocate Prisaila Samuel for the respondents. Respondent No.2 Mr. Prashant Sharma also present in person.

Respondent

M/S. G.H.P. Enterprises Builders and Developers and Another

Excerpt

per mr. p.n. kashalkar, honble presiding judicial member appellant and respondents in this appeal no.881/2008 have arrived at consent terms before the lok adalat held on 16/10/2009 and have compromised the matter in presence of panel members. they have executed proforma as well as consent terms before the members of lok adalat. consent terms shall be binding on both the parties and in case of default committed by either party, other party shall be at liberty to invoke the jurisdiction of this commission to execute the said consent terms as if it is a decree passed by this commission.order 1. appeal as such stands disposed of in terms of consent terms, which shall form part of the award. 2. no order as to costs. 3. copies of the order be furnished to the parties.

Full Judgment

Per Mr. P.N. Kashalkar, Honble Presiding Judicial Member

Appellant and Respondents in this Appeal No.881/2008 have arrived at consent terms before the Lok Adalat held on 16/10/2009 and have compromised the matter in presence of Panel Members. They have executed proforma as well as consent terms before the members of Lok Adalat. Consent terms shall be binding on both the parties and in case of default committed by either party, other party shall be at liberty to invoke the jurisdiction of this Commission to execute the said consent terms as if it is a decree passed by this Commission.

ORDER

1. Appeal as such stands disposed of in terms of consent terms, which shall form part of the award.

2. No order as to costs.

3. Copies of the order be furnished to the parties.

Same Court & Year Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDR... Same Parties Mr. Rajkumar Sharma vs M/S. G.H.P. Enterprises Builders and D... Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge Shri P.N. Kashalkar, Honâble Presiding Judicial Member M...