Model Constructions and Others Vs. J. Jyothi Kumari and Others

Model Constructions and Others vs J. Jyothi Kumari and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad Decided Jun 07, 2010

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1110347

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1110347
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Judge: The Honourable Sri Justice D. Appa Rao, President, Sri Syed Abdullah, Member &Amp; Sri R. Lakshmi Narasimha Rao, Member
Decided On: Jun 07, 2010
Case Number: F.A. No. 1624 of 2008 AGAINST C.D. No. 13 of 2005 DISTRICT FORUM, KURNOOL
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Model Constructions and Others

Advocate Counsel for the Appellants: M/s. S. Sasidhar Reddy, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondents: Mr. M. Venakataramana Reddy, Advocate.

Respondent

J. Jyothi Kumari and Others

Excerpt

oral order:(per honble justice sri d. appa rao, president) the appellants filed a compromise memo representing that the matters were compromised wherein an amount of rs.50,000/- was received by the complainants/respondents towards full and final settlement and therefore requested to dispose of the appeals in the light of the compromise memo. all the parties to the proceedings have signed the compromise and the complainant admitted that he has received rs.50,000/- (rs.25,000/- each) by way of d.d. bearing nos.970658 dated 07-6-2010 in favour of 4th respondent and 970659 dated 07-6-2010 in favour of 3rd respondent evidenced by photostat copies of the d.ds. in view of the full and final settlement, the appeals are disposed of in terms of the compromise. there shall be no order as to costs. n.b.ws. issued in p.p.no.28/2009 are recalled.

Full Judgment

Oral order:(Per Honble Justice Sri D. Appa Rao, President)

The appellants filed a compromise memo representing that the matters were compromised wherein an amount of Rs.50,000/- was received by the complainants/respondents towards full and final settlement and therefore requested to dispose of the appeals in the light of the compromise memo.

All the parties to the proceedings have signed the compromise and the complainant admitted that he has received Rs.50,000/- (Rs.25,000/- each) by way of D.D. bearing Nos.970658 dated 07-6-2010 in favour of 4th respondent and 970659 dated 07-6-2010 in favour of 3rd respondent evidenced by photostat copies of the D.Ds.

In view of the full and final settlement, the appeals are disposed of in terms of the compromise. There shall be no order as to costs.

N.B.Ws. issued in P.P.No.28/2009 are recalled.

Same Court & Year Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission S... Same Parties Model Constructions and Others vs J. Jyothi Kumari and Others Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge The Honourable Sri Justice D. Appa Rao, President, Sri Syed A...