Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

C.P. Jayachandra Kaimal Vs. M/S Star Foundations and Structures Pvt. Ltd.

C.P. Jayachandra Kaimal vs M/S Star Foundations and Structures Pvt. Ltd.

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram Decided Jan 12, 2011
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1109903

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
First Appeal No. 745/2005 (Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District )
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

C.P. Jayachandra Kaimal

Respondent

M/S Star Foundations and Structures Pvt. Ltd.

Excerpt

shri.m.v. viswanathan: judicial member it is reported that the matter has been settled. counsel for the appellant is represented. no representation for the respondent. appellant has been taking time for filing settlement memo. but so far he could not file the same. hence the appeal is dismissed as settled.

Full Judgment

SHRI.M.V. VISWANATHAN: JUDICIAL MEMBER

It is reported that the matter has been settled. Counsel for the appellant is represented. No representation for the respondent. Appellant has been taking time for filing settlement memo. But so far he could not file the same. Hence the appeal is dismissed as settled.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial