Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

K. Sudhakaran Vs. the Manager (Services), M/S Popular Vehicles and Services Ltd.

K. Sudhakaran vs The Manager (Services), M/S Popular Vehicles and Services Ltd.

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram Decided Jan 24, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1108511

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Revision Petition No. RP/11/41 (Arisen out of Order Dated 28/02/2011 in Case No. CC/10/84 of District Kollam)
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

K. Sudhakaran

Respondent

The Manager (Services), M/S Popular Vehicles and Services Ltd.

Excerpt

justice shri. k.r. udayabhanu: president the revision petitioner is the complainant in cc.84/2010 in the file of cdrf, kollam. the complaint stands dismissed for default. it is submitted by the revision pettiioner/complainant that he was present before the forum on the particular day. but he went out for a short duration and in the meantime the complaint was dismissed. in the circumstances the order of the forum is setaside. the matter is remitted back to the forum. the forum will issue notice to the opposite parties and dispose of the case on merits. the matter stands posted before the forum on 29.02.2012. office will forward a copy of this order to the forum.

Full Judgment

JUSTICE SHRI. K.R. UDAYABHANU: PRESIDENT

The Revision petitioner is the complainant in CC.84/2010 in the file of CDRF, Kollam. The complaint stands dismissed for default. It is submitted by the Revision Pettiioner/complainant that he was present before the Forum on the particular day. But he went out for a short duration and in the meantime the complaint was dismissed.

In the circumstances the order of the Forum is setaside. The matter is remitted back to the Forum. The Forum will issue notice to the opposite parties and dispose of the case on merits. The matter stands posted before the Forum on 29.02.2012.

Office will forward a copy of this order to the Forum.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial