Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Communidade of Sirsaim and Another Vs. State of Goa and Others

Communidade of Sirsaim and Another vs State of Goa and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Mumbai Goa Decided Jan 17, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1105104

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Mumbai Goa High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Writ Petition No.190 of 2009
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Communidade of Sirsaim and Another

Respondent

State of Goa and Others

Excerpt

oral judgment: (v.m. kanade, j.) heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondents. 2. by this petition which is filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, the petitioners are seeking the following reliefs: (i) that the honourable court be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or an order directing the respondents no.5 to 10 to immediately stop illegal constructions being carried out in the communidade property. (ii) that the honourable court be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or an order directing the village panchayat, the respondent no.4, to stop illegal constructions being carried on in the communidade property by exercising power under section 66(3) of the panchayat raj act. (iii) that the honourable court be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or an order directing the government to give protection to the communidade under at. 5 of the code and direct the collector (n) to exercise power vested under art. 371 of the code of communidades for immediate demolition of the structures being put up by the respondents no.5 to 10 in the communidade property. (iv) that the honourable court be pleased to direct the government to appoint the administrator and secretary on full time basis. v) any other order or direction that this hon'ble court thinks proper in the circumstances of the case. vi) ad-interim ex-parte order in terms of prayers (i) and (ii) above. 3. in our view the petition can be disposed of by giving a direction to the petitioners to file a complaint in the prescribed form, if any, to the village panchayat and to the collector. upon the said complaint being received, both the authorities shall process the said complaint and take action in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible and in any case within a period of three months. 4. with this direction, the petition is disposed of.

Full Judgment

Oral Judgment: (V.M. Kanade, J.)

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondents.

2. By this petition which is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners are seeking the following reliefs:

(i) That the Honourable Court be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or a writ in the nature of Mandamus or an order directing the Respondents no.5 to 10 to immediately stop illegal constructions being carried out in the Communidade property.

(ii) That the Honourable Court be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or a Writ in the nature of Mandamus or an order directing the Village Panchayat, the Respondent no.4, to stop illegal constructions being carried on in the Communidade property by exercising power under section 66(3) of The Panchayat Raj Act.

(iii) That the Honourable Court be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or a Writ in the nature of Mandamus or an order directing the Government to give protection to the Communidade under At. 5 of the Code and direct the Collector (N) to exercise power vested under Art. 371 of the Code of Communidades for immediate demolition of the structures being put up by the Respondents no.5 to 10 in the Communidade property.

(iv) That the Honourable Court be pleased to direct the Government to appoint the Administrator and Secretary on full time basis.

v) Any other order or direction that this Hon'ble Court thinks proper in the circumstances of the case.

vi) Ad-interim ex-parte order in terms of prayers (i) and (ii) above.

3. In our view the petition can be disposed of by giving a direction to the petitioners to file a complaint in the prescribed form, if any, to the Village Panchayat and to the Collector. Upon the said complaint being received, both the authorities shall process the said complaint and take action in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible and in any case within a period of three months.

4. With this direction, the petition is disposed of.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial