Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Bhaskar and Another Vs. State of Maharashtra and Another

Bhaskar and Another vs State of Maharashtra and Another

Type Court Judgment Court Mumbai Nagpur Decided Apr 03, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1104822

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Mumbai Nagpur High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Criminal Application (APL) No.555 of 2012
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 482 – Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 406, 408, 420 r/w 34 – Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Section 88 – Comparative Citation: 2013 ALL MR (CRI) 2712

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Bhaskar and Another

Respondent

State of Maharashtra and Another

Excerpt

code of criminal procedure, 1973 - section 482 – indian penal code, 1860 - section 406, 408, 420 r/w 34 – maharashtra co-operative societies act, 1960 - section 88 – comparative citation: 2013 all mr (cri) 2712.....2. by this application, the applicants/directors of shri gajanan urban cooperative credit society seek that f.i.r. registered with khamgaon city police station on 17.6.2011 bearing crime no.86/11 for offence punishable under sections 406, 408, 420 read with section 34 of indian penal code be quashed. the offence came to be registered against the directors and members of the staff of the society on the allegation that huge amounts were disbursed to the debtors without taking adequate security. it was alleged that the directors and employees of the society did not take steps to recover the amounts due. it seems that the district deputy registrar of the cooperative society had directed an enquiry under section 88 of the maharashtra cooperative societies act, 1960 and had appointed advocate mr. vijay pawar as an enquiry officer. from the reply of respondent no.2 auditor on whose report the offence was registered, it is clear that during the enquiry by mr. vijay pawar, he did not find any incriminating material against the present applicants, i.e. bhaskar bhosle and bhaskar ghorade. the enquiry officer also seems to have not found any incriminating material against sapna jagannath kalone, an employee who had similarly filed criminal application (apl) no.613/12 for quashing of the said fir. this application was allowed by judgment dated 21.3.2013 by division bench of this court. one of us (p.b. varale, j.) was a party to the said judgment. since the applicants are similarly placed, no different view need be taken about them. 3. in view of this, we find that this is a fit case for exercise of inherent powers of this court under section 482 of the criminal procedure code and, therefore, quash the proceedings commenced against the applicants by fir no.86/11 registered with khamgaon city police station. 4. with the above observations, the criminal application stands disposed of. rule is accordingly made absolute in the above terms. no order as to costs.

Full Judgment

Oral Judgment: (R.C. Chavan, J.)

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties finally by consent.

2. By this application, the applicants/Directors of Shri Gajanan Urban Cooperative Credit Society seek that F.I.R. registered with Khamgaon City Police Station on 17.6.2011 bearing Crime No.86/11 for offence punishable under Sections 406, 408, 420 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code be quashed. The offence came to be registered against the Directors and members of the staff of the society on the allegation that huge amounts were disbursed to the debtors without taking adequate security. It was alleged that the Directors and employees of the Society did not take steps to recover the amounts due. It seems that the District Deputy Registrar of the Cooperative Society had directed an enquiry under Section 88 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 and had appointed Advocate Mr. Vijay Pawar as an Enquiry Officer. From the reply of respondent no.2 Auditor on whose report the offence was registered, it is clear that during the enquiry by Mr. Vijay Pawar, he did not find any incriminating material against the present applicants, i.e. Bhaskar Bhosle and Bhaskar Ghorade. The Enquiry Officer also seems to have not found any incriminating material against Sapna Jagannath Kalone, an employee who had similarly filed Criminal Application (APL) No.613/12 for quashing of the said FIR. This application was allowed by judgment dated 21.3.2013 by Division Bench of this Court. One of us (P.B. Varale, J.) was a party to the said judgment. Since the applicants are similarly placed, no different view need be taken about them.

3. In view of this, we find that this is a fit case for exercise of inherent powers of this Court under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code and, therefore, quash the proceedings commenced against the applicants by FIR No.86/11 registered with Khamgaon City Police Station.

4. With the above observations, the Criminal Application stands disposed of. Rule is accordingly made absolute in the above terms. No order as to costs.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial