Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Alkabai Others Vs. State of Maharashtra and Another

Alkabai Others vs State of Maharashtra and Another

Type Court Judgment Court Mumbai Aurangabad Decided May 02, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1104769

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Mumbai Aurangabad High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Criminal Application No.1360 of 2008
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 482 – Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Section 3(1)(x) – Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955 - Section 7(1)(d) – Comparative Citation: 2013 ALL MR (CRI) 2309

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Alkabai Others

Respondent

State of Maharashtra and Another

Excerpt

code of criminal procedure, 1973 - section 482 – scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (prevention of atrocities) act, 1989 - section 3(1)(x) – protection of civil rights act, 1955 - section 7(1)(d) – comparative citation: 2013 all mr (cri) 2309oral judgment: (naresh h. patil, j.) shri. godsay, learned counsel appearing for the applicants, on instructions, submits that charge-sheet has been filed in respect of the subject crime. the learned counsel further submits that liberty be granted to raise appropriate challenge in view of filing of the chargesheet. 2. we have perused the complaint and considered the submissions advanced. we have also perused the order passed by the learned single judge on 12th march, 2009. 3. the applicants are at liberty to raise appropriate challenge to the charge-sheet filed by the police, in accordance with law. we direct that no coercive action be taken against the applicants till 21st june, 2013. the proceedings initiated on the complaint filed against the applicants on 21st march 2008, being crime no.36 of 2008, registered with police station, dharangaon, dist-jalgaon, shall stand stayed till 21st june, 2013. all issues are kept open. 4. rule is made absolute on the terms indicated above.

Full Judgment

Oral Judgment: (Naresh H. Patil, J.)

Shri. Godsay, learned counsel appearing for the Applicants, on instructions, submits that charge-sheet has been filed in respect of the subject crime. The learned counsel further submits that liberty be granted to raise appropriate challenge in view of filing of the chargesheet.

2. We have perused the complaint and considered the submissions advanced. We have also perused the order passed by the learned Single Judge on 12th March, 2009.

3. The Applicants are at liberty to raise appropriate challenge to the charge-sheet filed by the police, in accordance with law. We direct that no coercive action be taken against the Applicants till 21st June, 2013. The proceedings initiated on the complaint filed against the Applicants on 21st March 2008, being Crime No.36 of 2008, registered with Police Station, Dharangaon, Dist-Jalgaon, shall stand stayed till 21st June, 2013. All issues are kept open.

4. Rule is made absolute on the terms indicated above.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial