Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Harilal Vs. Sruthi

Harilal vs Sruthi

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Nov 29, 2013
~4 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1099572

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Harilal

Respondent

Sruthi

Excerpt

.....of 2013 of the poovar police station for the offences punishable under secs.341, 323, 324, 307 and 153a r/w. sec. 34 of the penal code, apprehend arrest and have filed this application.2. case is that on 20.10.2013 at 10:00 p.m., while the de facto complainant and his friend, justin were going on a motor cycle, the petitioner and others attacked them with iron rod and stick.3. learned public prosecutor has submitted that the first accused used iron road and 2nd and 3rd accused used stick. though the stick is recovered, the iron rod is not so far recovered.4. learned counsel submits that the police registered crime no. 706 of 2013 against justin for attacking the first b.a no.7909 of 2013 2 petitioner on 27.10.2013. case was registered for the offences punishable under secs. 323, 341, 323, 320, 153a and 294(b) r/w sec.34 of the penal code.5. i have gone through the cd file concerning the nature of allegations made against the petitioners. having regard to the circumstances, i am inclined to grant relief to the petitioners but subject to conditions:1. petitioners/accused 2 and 3 shall surrender before the officer investigating crime no. 751 of 2013 of the poovar police station on 06.12.2013 at 10:00 a.m. for interrogation. 2) in case interrogation is not completed that day, it is open to the investigating officer to direct presence of the petitioners before him on other date/dates and time which the petitioners shall comply. 3) petitioners shall co-operate with the investigation of the case. 4) in case of arrest, petitioners shall be produced before the jurisdictional magistrate the same day. 4) on such production, the petitioners shall be released on bail (if not required to be detained otherwise) in crime no. 751 of 2013 of the poovar police station b.a no.7909 of 2013 3 on their executing bond for rs.20,000/- (rupees twenty thousand only) each with two sureties each for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned magistrate and subject to the.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE29H DAY OF NOVEMBER20138TH AGRAHAYANA, 1935 Bail Appl..No. 7909 of 2013 () ------------------------------- CRIME NO. 751/2013 OF POOVAR POLICE STATION , THIRUVANANDAPURAM PETITIONER/ ACCUSED NO2& 3: ----------------------------- 1. ABDUL KARIM @ KARIM, AGED25YEARS S/O SHAHUL HAMMED, APPAMARAPOTTA VEEDU, ATTUPURAM UCHAKADA P.O, POOVAR, TRIVANDRUM2 MALIK MOHAMMED@ MALIK, S/O SHAHUL HAMEED, APPAMARAPOTTA VEEDU ATTUPURAM, UCHAKADA P.O, POOVAR, TRIVANDRUM BY ADV. SRI.S.MOHAMMED AL RAFI RESPONDENTS/ COMPLAINANT: -------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.LELIZA THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON2911-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: MNS THOMAS P. JOSEPH, J.

========================= Bail Application No. 7909 of 2013 ============================ Dated this the 28th day of November, 2013 ORDER

Petitioners are accused Nos. 2 and 3, in Crime No.751 of 2013 of the Poovar police station for the offences punishable under Secs.341, 323, 324, 307 and 153A r/w. Sec. 34 of the Penal Code, apprehend arrest and have filed this application.

2. Case is that on 20.10.2013 at 10:00 p.m., while the de facto complainant and his friend, Justin were going on a motor cycle, the petitioner and others attacked them with iron rod and stick.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor has submitted that the first accused used iron road and 2nd and 3rd accused used stick. Though the stick is recovered, the iron rod is not so far recovered.

4. Learned counsel submits that the police registered Crime No. 706 of 2013 against Justin for attacking the first B.A No.7909 of 2013 2 petitioner on 27.10.2013. Case was registered for the offences punishable under Secs. 323, 341, 323, 320, 153A and 294(b) r/w Sec.34 of the Penal Code.

5. I have gone through the CD file concerning the nature of allegations made against the petitioners. Having regard to the circumstances, I am inclined to grant relief to the petitioners but subject to conditions:

1. Petitioners/accused 2 and 3 shall surrender before the officer investigating Crime No. 751 of 2013 of the Poovar police station on 06.12.2013 at 10:00 a.m. for interrogation. 2) In case interrogation is not completed that day, it is open to the investigating officer to direct presence of the petitioners before him on other date/dates and time which the petitioners shall comply. 3) Petitioners shall co-operate with the investigation of the case. 4) In case of arrest, petitioners shall be produced before the jurisdictional magistrate the same day. 4) On such production, the petitioners shall be released on bail (if not required to be detained otherwise) in Crime No. 751 of 2013 of the Poovar police station B.A No.7909 of 2013 3 on their executing bond for Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty thousand only) each with two sureties each for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned magistrate and subject to the following conditions:- a) One of the sureties shall be a close relative of any of the petitioners. b) Petitioners shall report to the investigating officer on every Saturday between 10:00 a.m. and 12:00 p.m. until filing of the final report. c) Petitioners shall report to the investigating officer as and when required for interrogation. d) Petitioners shall not, except for compliance of the above said conditions enter the local limits of Poovar police station until otherwise ordered and except with the permission of the jurisdictional magistrate ( until committal if any and thereafter of the learned Principal Sessions Judge concerned). b) Petitioners shall not intimidate/influence the witnesses. c) Petitioners shall not get involved in any offence during the period of this bail. d) It is made clear that in case any of the above B.A No.7909 of 2013 4 condition is violated, it is open to the Investigating Officer to seek cancellation of the bail granted hereby by moving application before the learned magistrate or before the learned Principal Sessions Judge as aforesaid as held in P.K. Shaji V. State of Kerala (AIR2006 Supreme Court 100). Sd/- THOMAS P.JOSEPH, JUDGE //true copy// P.A. to Judge Smv

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial