Stella V Vs. State of Kerala

Stella V vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Nov 26, 2013

~4 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1099296

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1099296
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice C.T.Ravikumar
Decided On: Nov 26, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Stella V

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....petitioner took up the matter before the fourth respondent. the fourth respondent declined to approve the appointment of the petitioner as per ext.p10 order dated 24.5.2013. feeling aggrieved by the same, the petitioner moved the second respondent. the second respondent as per ext.p13, rejected the request of the petitioner and virtually confirmed ext.p10 order. aggrieved by exts.p10 and p13, the petitioner has now preferred ext.p14 revision petition before the government. it is still pending. the short prayer of the petitioner is for a direction to the first w.p.(c).29006/13 2 respondent to consider ext.p14 revision petition and pass appropriate orders thereon expeditiously and in accordance with law. taking note of the fact that ext.p14 is pending before the first respondent and in view of the order i propose to pass in this writ petition i do not think it necessary to issue notice to the eighth respondent in this proceedings. since ext.p14 revision petition is pending before the first respondent, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the first respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on ext.p14 revision petition expeditiously and in accordance with law, at any rate, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. needless to say that before passing orders thereon, the eighth respondent shall also be put on notice. sd/- c.t. ravikumar (judge) spc/ w.p.(c).29006/13 3 c.t. ravikumar, j.judgment september,2010 w.p.(c).29006/13 4

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR TUESDAY, THE26H DAY OF NOVEMBER20135TH AGRAHAYANA, 1935 WP(C).No. 29006 of 2013 (A) PETITIONER(S): ------------------ STELLA V. W/O.YESUDASAN,LOWER GRADE LANGUAGE TEACHER (HINDI) ST.ANTONY'S U.P.S., KANDACHIRA, KOLLAM RESIDING AT MUNDUPOIKA THADATHIL, VELLIMON P.O KAITHAKODI, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.B.MOHANLAL RESPONDENT(S):

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001 2.DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, JAGATHY P.O THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695014 3.DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, CIVIL LINES, CUTCHERY P.O, KOLLAM-691013 4.ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,KOLLAM, CUTCHERY P.O KOLLAM-691013 5.ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, CHAVARA CHAVARA P.O, KOLLAM6ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KARUNAGAPPALLY PIN-691583, KARUNAGAPPALLY P.O, KOLLAM7ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KUNDARA, KUNDARA P.O, KOLLAM, PIN-691501 8.CORPORATE MANAGER OF CATHOLIC SCHOOLS, BISHOPS HOUSE, THANKASSERY P.O, KOLLAM-691007 R1,2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.M.A.FAYAZ THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON2611-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C).29006/13 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1:TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER

NO.8249/2001/EDN. DATED1710.2001 ISSUED BY THE8H RESPONDENT AND ITS APPROVAL ORDER

NO.C-2529/06/K.DIS. DATED236.2006 ISSUED BY THE6H RESPONDENT. P2:TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER

NO.8249/2001/EDN. DATED1610.2002 ISSUED BY THE8H RESPONDENT AND ITS APPROVAL ORDER

NO.C-2581/06/K.DIS. DATED306.2006 ISSUED BY THE6H RESPONDENT. P3:TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER

NO.8249/2001/EDN. DATED311.2003 ISSUED BY THE8H RESPONDENT AND ITS APPROVAL ORDER

NO.B3-9074/06/ DATED193.2006 ISSUED BY THE3D RESPONDENT. P4:TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER

NO.8249/2001/EDN. DATED206.2004 AND ITS APPROVAL ORDER

NO.D/262/06/K.DIS. DATED22.2006 ISSUED BY THE7H RESPONDENT. P5:TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER

NO.8249/2001/EDN. DATED2211.2004 OF THE8H RESPONDENT AND ITS APPROVAL ORDER

ISSUED BY THE3D RESPONDENT. P6:TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT DATED16.2005 OF THE8H RESPONDENT AND ITS APPROVAL ORDER

NO.B3-9071/06 DATED223.2007OF THE3D RESPONDENT. P7:TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER

NO.C/664/2010 DATED48.2011 OF THE5H RESPONDENT. P8:TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER

NO.8249/2001/EDN. DATED16.2010 OF THE8H RESPONDENT AND ITS APPROVAL ORDER

NO.B3-13412/2011/L.DIS DATED3112.2011 OF THE3D RESPONDENT. P9:TRUE COPY OF THE SENIORITY LIST OF HIGH SCHOOL TEACHERS OF THE8H RESPONDENT CORPORATE EDUCATIONAL AGENCY FOR THE SUBJECT HINDI FROM11.2000 TO315.2011. P10:TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER

NO.C-2875/2011/L.DIS. DATED245.2012 OF THE4H RESPONDENT. P11:TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER

NO.E.T.I/73214/12/D.P.I/K.DIS. DATED1912.2012 ISSUED BY THE2D RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. P12:TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY NO.A4/2015/13 DATED54.2013 ISSUED BY THE3D RESPONDENT UNDER RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT TO THE PETITIONER. P13:TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER

NO.F4/7270/13/DPI/K.DIS. DATED117.2013 ISSUED BY THE2D RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. P4:TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE1T RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J.

========================== W.P.(C). No.29006 OF2013========================== Dated this the 26th day of November, 2013 JUDGMENT

The grievance of the petitioner is regarding the non-approval of her appointment as Full Time Language Teacher (Hindi) from 1.6.2005. Earlier, aggrieved by the order passed by the inferior authorities, the petitioner took up the matter before the fourth respondent. The fourth respondent declined to approve the appointment of the petitioner as per Ext.P10 order dated 24.5.2013. Feeling aggrieved by the same, the petitioner moved the second respondent. The second respondent as per Ext.P13, rejected the request of the petitioner and virtually confirmed Ext.P10 order. Aggrieved by Exts.P10 and P13, the petitioner has now preferred Ext.P14 revision petition before the Government. It is still pending. The short prayer of the petitioner is for a direction to the first W.P.(C).29006/13 2 respondent to consider Ext.P14 revision petition and pass appropriate orders thereon expeditiously and in accordance with law. Taking note of the fact that Ext.P14 is pending before the first respondent and in view of the order I propose to pass in this writ petition I do not think it necessary to issue notice to the eighth respondent in this proceedings. Since Ext.P14 revision petition is pending before the first respondent, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the first respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P14 revision petition expeditiously and in accordance with law, at any rate, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Needless to say that before passing orders thereon, the eighth respondent shall also be put on notice. Sd/- C.T. RAVIKUMAR (JUDGE) spc/ W.P.(C).29006/13 3 C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J.

JUDGMENT

September,2010 W.P.(C).29006/13 4

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2013 Same Parties Stella V vs State of Kerala Same Subject Education Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice C.T.Ravikumar