Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Suresh Vs. Rajamma

Suresh vs Rajamma

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Nov 26, 2013
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1098795

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Suresh

Respondent

Rajamma

Excerpt

.....2013 order this is a petition filed under section 482 of cr.p.c. seeking to have all further proceedings in s.c. no. 467 of 2010 pending before the district and sessions court, pathanamthitta quashed.2. petitioners are accused nos. 1 and 2 in s.c.no. 467/2010 on the file of district and sessions court, pathanamthitta for having committed offences punishable under sections 447, 294(b), 323, 324 and 354 read with section 34 of ipc.3. it is unnecessary to go into the facts and details of the case for the simple reason that the petitioners have impleaded the defacto complainant and the victim as respondents 1 and 2 in this proceedings who have entered appearance through a counsel and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 accepts that the affidavit produced along with this petition as annexures b crl.m.c. no. 5575 of 2013 -2- and c are in fact sworn to by respondents 1 and 2 and they stand by the statements contained therein.4. on going through the said affidavit, it is seen that the parties have settled all their disputes and differences between them and they have no issues remain to be redressed. it is also pointed out that the first and the second respondent are not interested in continuing with the proceedings further. though the offences are serious and not compoundable, in the light of the stand taken by the respondents 1 and 2, it is felt that continuance of proceedings will be only an exercise in futility. therefore, this petition is allowed. all further proceedings in s.c. no. 467 of 2010 pending before the district and sessions court, pathanamthitta including the final report based on which cognizance was taken by the jfcm court concerned shall stand quashed and the petitioner shall stand discharged. p.bhavadasan judge ds

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN TUESDAY, THE26H DAY OF NOVEMBER20135TH AGRAHAYANA, 1935 Crl.MC.No. 5575 of 2013 --------------------------- SC NO.467/2010 OF DISTRICT & SESSIONS COURT,PATHANAMTHITTA ....... /PETITIONERS/ACCUSED1& 2: ------------------------------------------------ 1. SURESH, AGED28YEARS, S/O. GOPI, CHAKKATTUSSERIL HOUSE, KURUMALA, VALLAMKULAM KIZHAKKUMURI, ERAVIPEROOR.

2. ABHILASH, AGED19YEARS, S/O. THAMPY, CHAKKATTUSSERIL HOUSE, KURUMALA, VALLAMKULAM KIZHAKKUMURI, ERAVIPEROOR. BY ADVS.SRI.T.P.PRADEEP SRI.P.K.SATHEESH KUMAR RESPONDENTS/CW1, 3 & STATE: ---------------------------------------------------- 1. RAJAMMA, D/O. CHELLAMMA, CHANGAMANNIL HOUSE, VALLAMKULAM KIZHAKKU MURI, NANNOOR, ERAVIPEROOR VILLAGE, THIRUVALLA-689 542.

2. SAJINI, D/O. RAJAMMA, VALIYAPARAMBIL HOUSE, VALLAMKULAM KIZHAKKU MURI, NANNOOR, ERAVIPEROOR VILLAGE, THIRUVALLA-689 542.

3. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.ABHILASH GOPAN R3 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.DHANESH MATHEW MANJOORAN THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON2611-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss Crl.MC.No. 5575 of 2013 ------------------------------------ APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES: --------------------------------------------- ANNEXURE A- CERITIFIED COPY OF CHARGE SHEET IN S.C.NO. 467/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE DISTRICT & SESSIONS COURT, PATHANAMTHITTA. ANNEXURE B- TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT OF1T RESPONDENT DATED1511-2013. ANNEXURE C- TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT OF2D RESPONDENT DATED1511-2013. RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES: ------------------------------------------------ N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE Kss P.BHAVADASAN, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Crl.M.C. No. 5575 of 2013 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 26th day of November, 2013 ORDER

This is a petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. seeking to have all further proceedings in S.C. No. 467 of 2010 pending before the District and Sessions Court, Pathanamthitta quashed.

2. Petitioners are accused Nos. 1 and 2 in S.C.No. 467/2010 on the file of District and Sessions Court, Pathanamthitta for having committed offences punishable under Sections 447, 294(b), 323, 324 and 354 read with Section 34 of IPC.

3. It is unnecessary to go into the facts and details of the case for the simple reason that the petitioners have impleaded the defacto complainant and the victim as respondents 1 and 2 in this proceedings who have entered appearance through a counsel and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 accepts that the affidavit produced along with this petition as Annexures B Crl.M.C. No. 5575 of 2013 -2- and C are in fact sworn to by respondents 1 and 2 and they stand by the statements contained therein.

4. On going through the said affidavit, it is seen that the parties have settled all their disputes and differences between them and they have no issues remain to be redressed. It is also pointed out that the first and the second respondent are not interested in continuing with the proceedings further. Though the offences are serious and not compoundable, in the light of the stand taken by the respondents 1 and 2, it is felt that continuance of proceedings will be only an exercise in futility. Therefore, this petition is allowed. All further proceedings in S.C. No. 467 of 2010 pending before the District and Sessions Court, Pathanamthitta including the final report based on which cognizance was taken by the JFCM court concerned shall stand quashed and the petitioner shall stand discharged. P.BHAVADASAN JUDGE ds

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial