Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Appellant Vs. Respondent

Appellant vs Respondent

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Nov 28, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1098596

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kolkata High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Appellant

Respondent

Respondent

Excerpt

.....of or alienating any of its fixed assets in any manner whatsoever without the previous leave of court. the company should also pay a sum of rs.30,000/- on account of interest for the delayed payment till the month of november, 2013. affidavit-in-opposition be filed within three weeks from date; reply thereto, if any, may be filed within a week thereafter. ca no.506 of 2013 may be mentioned before the appropriate bench after completion of affidavits. the sum of rs.30,000/- is the additional interest which has been directed to be paid in view of the default and should not be adjusted from the sum found due by the appellate order of march 13, 2013. since the official liquidator has sealed the registered and corporate offices of the company, the official liquidator should ensure that such offices are opened in cours.of the day and the company allowed to function from such offices. ca no.521 of 2013, which is the company’s application for vacating the order of provisional liquidator, is disposed of without any order as to costs. certified website copies of this order, if applied for, be urgently supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities. (sanjib banerjee, j.) sg.

Full Judgment

CA No.521 of 2013 CA No.506 of 2013 CP No.560 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Original Jurisdiction In the matter of :MAHESHWARY ISPAT LTD.And TATA CAPITAL FINANCIAL SEREVICES LTD.Appearance Mr.Jishnu Chowdhury, Adv.Ms.R.Kajaria, Adv.Mr.Soumabho Ghosh, Adv.…Company Mr.Tilak Bose, Sr.Adv.Ms.Manju Bhuteria, Adv.…Petitioning-Creditor BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SANJIB BANERJEE Date : 28th November, 2013.

The Court : Since the entire defaulted amount till the month of November, 2013 has now been paid off by the company to the petitioningcreditor, the order passed appointing the Official Liquidator as the Provisional Liquidator is recalled.

There will, however, be an injunction restraining the company, whether by itself or by its servants or agents or otherwise howsoever from dealing with or disposing of or alienating any of its fixed assets in any manner whatsoever without the previous leave of Court.

The company should also pay a sum of Rs.30,000/- on account of interest for the delayed payment till the month of November, 2013.

Affidavit-in-opposition be filed within three weeks from date; reply thereto, if any, may be filed within a week thereafter.

CA No.506 of 2013 may be mentioned before the appropriate Bench after completion of affidavits.

The sum of Rs.30,000/- is the additional interest which has been directed to be paid in view of the default and should not be adjusted from the sum found due by the appellate order of March 13, 2013.

Since the Official Liquidator has sealed the registered and corporate offices of the company, the Official Liquidator should ensure that such offices are opened in couRs.of the day and the company allowed to function from such offices.

CA No.521 of 2013, which is the company’s application for vacating the order of Provisional Liquidator, is disposed of without any order as to costs.

Certified website copies of this order, if applied for, be urgently supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.

(SANJIB BANERJEE, J.) sg.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial