Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

K.Ashraf Vs. Muhammed

K.Ashraf vs Muhammed

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Nov 06, 2013
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1097583

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

K.Ashraf

Respondent

Muhammed

Excerpt

.....annexure a6- atrue copy of the judgment dated2502-2012 in s.c.no. 568/2009 on the files of the additional district and sessions judge, fast track (adhoc-i), kozhikode. annexure a7- acertified copy of the judgment dated254-2013 in s.c.no. 574/2011 on the files of the additional distict and sessions judge, fast track (adhoc-1), kozhikode. annexure a8- the original affidvait sworn by the first respondent dated209-2013. respondent(s)' exhibits: nil --------------------------------------- /true copy/ p.a to judge lsn harun-ul-rashid, j.- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - crl. m.c no. 5020 of 2013 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - dated this the 06th day of november, 2013. order heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and respondents.2. accused nos. 1 and 6 in crime no. 399/2007 on the files of thamarasserry police station are the petitioners. the petition is filed seeking to quash annexure-a1 f.i.r and annexure-a5 final report in crime no. 399/2007.3. the offence alleged is punishable under sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 323, 324 and 308 r/w sec.149 of ipc.4. the learned counsel on both sides submit that the disputes between the parties have been amicably settled and having regard to the resolution of the disputes between the parties, continuance of the criminal prosecution against the petitioners is an avoidable irritant. in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, the crl.m.c is disposed of quashing annexure-a1 f.i.r and annexure-a5 final report in crime no. 399/2007 of thamarasserry police station. harun-ul-rashid, judge. lsn

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID WEDNESDAY, THE6H DAY OF NOVEMBER201315TH KARTHIKA, 1935 Crl.MC.No. 5020 of 2013 () --------------------------- CRIME NO. 399/2007 OF THAMARASSERY POLICE STATION , KOZHIKODE PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS. 1 AND6 --------------------------------------------------------- 1. K.ASHRAF, AGED39YEARS, S/O. KUNJAYINKUTTY, KANNEIRUPPIL HOUSE, EERPPONA, KEDAVOOR AMSOM, THACHAPOYIL P.O., KOZHIKODE-673573.

2. P.K.BASHEER, AGED33YEARS, S/O. AHAMMEDKUTTY, POOVATHUKANDY HOUSE, EERPPONA, KEDAVOOR AMSOM, THACHAPOYIL P.O., KOZHIKODE-673573. BY ADV. SRI.M.H.HANIL KUMAR RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT/STATE: ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUHAMMED, S/O. ABOOBACKER, MARUTHUNGAL HOUSE, VAVADU AMSOM, KOZHIKODE (DEFACTO COMPLAINANT).

2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THAMARASSERY POLICE STATION, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, COCHIN-682031.

3. STATE OF KERALA,, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, COCHIN-682031. R1 BY ADV. SRI.M.R.DHANIL R2 & R3 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT S HYMA THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON0611-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Crl.MC.No. 5020 of 2013 () --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- ANNEXURE A1- ACERTIFIED COPY OF THE FIRST INFORMATION REORT IN CRIME NO. 399/2007 ON THE FILES OF THE THAMARASSERY POLICE STATION DATED0409- 2007. ANNEXURE A2- ACERTIFIED COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF WITNESS RECORDED BY THE POLICE. ANNEXURE A3- ACERTIFIED COPY OF THE SCENE MAHAZAR DATED0409-2007 IN CRIME NO. 399/2007 ON THE FILES OF THE THAMARASSERY POLICE STATION. ANNEXURE A4- ACERTIFIED COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF EVIDENCE DAETD28 04-2008 IN CRIME NO. 399/2007 ON THE FILES OF THE THAMARASSERY POLICE STATION. ANNEXURE A5- ATRUE COPY OF THE FINAL REPOT SUBMITTED BEFORE THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, THAMARASSERY IN CRIME NO. 399/2007 DATED0409-2007. ANNEXURE A6- ATRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT

DATED2502-2012 IN S.C.NO. 568/2009 ON THE FILES OF THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, FAST TRACK (ADHOC-I), KOZHIKODE. ANNEXURE A7- ACERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT

DATED254-2013 IN S.C.NO. 574/2011 ON THE FILES OF THE ADDITIONAL DISTICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, FAST TRACK (ADHOC-1), KOZHIKODE. ANNEXURE A8- THE ORIGINAL AFFIDVAIT SWORN BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT DATED209-2013. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS: NIL --------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A TO JUDGE LSN HARUN-UL-RASHID, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Crl. M.C No. 5020 of 2013 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 06th day of November, 2013. ORDER

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and respondents.

2. Accused Nos. 1 and 6 in Crime No. 399/2007 on the files of Thamarasserry Police Station are the petitioners. The petition is filed seeking to quash Annexure-A1 F.I.R and Annexure-A5 Final Report in Crime No. 399/2007.

3. The offence alleged is punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 323, 324 and 308 r/w Sec.149 of IPC.

4. The learned counsel on both sides submit that the disputes between the parties have been amicably settled and having regard to the resolution of the disputes between the parties, continuance of the criminal prosecution against the petitioners is an avoidable irritant. In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, the Crl.M.C is disposed of quashing Annexure-A1 F.I.R and Annexure-A5 Final Report in Crime No. 399/2007 of Thamarasserry Police Station. HARUN-UL-RASHID, JUDGE. lsn

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial