Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

K.Pradeepan Vs. State of Kerala

K.Pradeepan vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Oct 29, 2013
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1096747

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

K.Pradeepan

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....move the application at a later stage of the investigation. according to the learned counsel, some of the accused are already released on bail. b.a no. 7172 of 2013 2 3. learned public prosecutor has opposed the application.4. having regard to the fact that petitioner is in custody from 17.10.2013 and since the petitioner is not reported to be involved in any other case, i am inclined to grant bail and subject to stringent conditions. resultantly, this application is allowed as under:- petitioner is granted bail in crime no.582 of 2013 of the chakarakkal police station (kannur district) and will be released, if not required to be detained otherwise on his executing bond for rs.25,000/- (rupees twenty five thousand only) with two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned magistrate subject to the following conditions:- a) the bail bond shall be executed within three weeks from this day. b) one of the sureties shall be a close relatives of the petitioner. c) petitioner shall report to the investigating officer on every saturday between 10:00 a.m. and 12:00 p.m. until otherwise ordered by the learned magistrate b.a no. 7172 of 2013 3 (until committal if any, and thereafter by the learned principal sessions judge concerned). d) petitioner shall report to the investigating officer as and when required for interrogation. e) petitioner shall not get involved in any offence during the period of this bail. f) petitioner shall not intimidate/influence the witnesses. g) it is made clear that in case any of the above conditions is violated, it is open to the investigating officer to seek cancellation of the bail granted hereby by moving application before the learned magistrate (until committal if any and thereafter, before the learned principle sessions judge concerned) as held in p.k. shaji v. state of kerala (air2006 supreme court 100). h) this order granting bail will take effect only from 06.11.2013 since the investigation is not completed. sd/-.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH TUESDAY, THE29H DAY OF OCTOBER20137TH KARTHIKA, 1935 Bail Appl..No. 7172 of 2013 () ----------------------------------------- CRIME NO. 582/2013 OF CHAKKARAKKAL POLICE SATION, KANNUR PETITIONERS/ACCUSED-1: --------------------------------------- K.PRADEEPAN, AGED40YEARS S/O.KUMARAN, LEELLA NIVAS, PALERRY PO MAMBA, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.SUMAN CHAKRAVARTHY RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT: ------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.SREEJITH THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON2910-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: MNS THOMAS P.JOSEPH, J.

========================= Bail Application No.7172 of 2013 ============================ Dated this the 29th day of October, 2013 ORDER

Petitioner is the first accused, in Crime No.582 of 2013 of the Chakarakkal police station (Kannur District) for the offences punishable under Secs. 143, 147, 148, 448 and 427 r/w. Sec. 149 of the Penal Code and Secs. 3 and 5 of the Explosive Substances Act, the allegation being that on 05.07.2013 at about 03:10 a.m., the petitioner and others trespassed into the reading room of a political party and damaged articles and burst bomb causing loss of around Rs.3 lakhs. Petitioner is in custody from 17.10.2013 and seeks bail.

2. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner is not involved in any other case and that he is falsely implicated. It is also submitted that his earlier bail application was rejected by this court allowing him to move the application at a later stage of the investigation. According to the learned counsel, some of the accused are already released on bail. B.A No. 7172 of 2013 2 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the application.

4. Having regard to the fact that petitioner is in custody from 17.10.2013 and since the petitioner is not reported to be involved in any other case, I am inclined to grant bail and subject to stringent conditions. Resultantly, this application is allowed as under:- Petitioner is granted bail in Crime No.582 of 2013 of the Chakarakkal police station (Kannur District) and will be released, if not required to be detained otherwise on his executing bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty five thousand only) with two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned magistrate subject to the following conditions:- a) The bail bond shall be executed within three weeks from this day. b) One of the sureties shall be a close relatives of the petitioner. c) Petitioner shall report to the Investigating Officer on every Saturday between 10:00 a.m. and 12:00 p.m. Until otherwise ordered by the learned magistrate B.A No. 7172 of 2013 3 (until committal if any, and thereafter by the learned Principal Sessions Judge concerned). d) Petitioner shall report to the investigating officer as and when required for interrogation. e) Petitioner shall not get involved in any offence during the period of this bail. f) Petitioner shall not intimidate/influence the witnesses. g) It is made clear that in case any of the above conditions is violated, it is open to the Investigating Officer to seek cancellation of the bail granted hereby by moving application before the learned magistrate (until committal if any and thereafter, before the learned Principle Sessions Judge concerned) as held in P.K. Shaji V. State of Kerala (AIR2006 Supreme Court 100). h) This order granting bail will take effect only from 06.11.2013 since the investigation is not completed. Sd/- THOMAS P.JOSEPH, JUDGE //true copy// P.A. to Judge Smv

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial