Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Krishnadas Vs. State of Kerala

Krishnadas vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Oct 24, 2013
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1096168

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Krishnadas

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....registered alleging commission of offence punishable under sections 341, 323, 384, 386, 468, 471, 506(i) read with section 34 of ipc.2. i have examined annexure-a copy of cmp no.369/2012, annexure b copy of fir in crime no.220/2012 of ottappalam police station, annexure c copy of the final report filed by the sub inspector of police, annexure d copy of the plaint in o.s.no.892/2011, sub court, palakkad, cr.m.c.no. 4509 of20132 annexure e copy of the written statement filed by the defendant in o.s.52/2012, sub court palakkad and annexure f copy of the written statement filed by the defendant in o.s.no.52/2012, sub court, palakkad. the materials perused primarily disclose offence under sections 341, 323, 384, 386, 468, 471, 506(i) read with section 34 of ipc. the crl.m.c. is filed seeking to quash crime no.220/2012 of ottappalam police station pending as c.c.no.292/2012 of judicial first class magistrate court ottappalam. in the facts and circumstances of the case, i am not inclined to allow the prayer. accordingly, crl.m.c. is dismissed without prejudice to the right of the petitioners to prefer a petition for discharge, if so advised. the petitioners are at liberty to raise all the contentions alongwith supporting materials. sd/- harun-ul-rashid, judge. /true copy/ p.a. to judge skv

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID THURSDAY, THE24H DAY OF OCTOBER20132ND KARTHIKA, 1935 Crl.MC.No. 4509 of 2013 --------------------------- CC NO.292/2012 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, OTTAPPALAM .... CRIME NO. 220/2012 OF OTTAPALAM POLICE STATION , PALAKKAD ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS. 1 TO4 --------------------------------------------------------- 1. KRISHNADAS, AGED35YEARS, S/O.DAMODARAN, THEKKETHIL HOUSE, OTTAPPALAM P.O., PALAKKAD.

2. BABU BHASKER, AGED42YEARS S/O. BHASKER, KRISHNA KRIPA, VANIAMKULAM, OTTAPALAM, PALAKKAD.

3. PADMA PRAKASH, AGED29YEARS, S/O. RADHAKRISHNAN, KARIAMKUNNU HOUSE, KERALASSERY P.O., PALAKKAD.

4. CHANDRA KUMAR, AGED50YEARS, S/O. RAMANKUTTY, MADATHILTHODI, SOUTH PANAMANNA, OTTAPPALAM, PALAKKAD. BY ADVS.SRI.V.V.ASOKAN SRI.P.P.RAMACHANDRAN RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, (SHO OTTAPPALAM POLICE STATION) REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682 031.

2. VIJAYAN, AGED53YEARS. S/O. APPUKUTTAN, NETTUMANI, NENMENI P.O., CHITTOOR, PALAKKAD-678 506. R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. ROY THOMAS THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON2410-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss Crl.MC.No. 4509 of 2013 ----------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES: -------------------------------------------- ANNEXURE A: TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE2D RESPONDENT BEFORE THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, OTTAPPALAM (CMP NO.369/2012) DATED132.2012. ANEXURE B: TRUE COPY OF THE FIRST INFORMATION REPORT IN CRIME NO.220 OF 2012 OF OTTAPPALAM POLICE STATION DATED182.2012. ANNEXURE C: TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT FILED BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, OTTAPPALAM DATED86.2012. ANNEXURE D: TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT IN O.S.892/2011, SUB COURT, PALAKKAD DATED2012.2011. ANNEXURE E: TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT IN O.S.52/2012, SUB COURT, PALAKKAD DATED201.2012. ANNEXURE F: TRUE COPY OF THE WRITTEN STATEMENT FILED BY THE DEFENDANT IN O.S.52/2012, SUB COURT, PALAKKAD DATED1112.2012. RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES: ----------------------------------------------- N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE Kss HARUN-UL-RASHID,J ------------------------------------- Cr.M.C.No. 4509 OF2013----------------------------------------- Dated this the 24th day of October, 2013 ORDER

Petitioners are the accused Nos.1 to 4 in C.C.No.292/2012 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Ottappalam. The 2nd respondent herein filed a private complaint before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Ottappalam as C.M.P.No.365/2012. The court below forwarded the same under Section 156(3) of the Cr.P.C. to the Ottappalam Police. Crime No.220/2012 was registered alleging commission of offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 384, 386, 468, 471, 506(i) read with Section 34 of IPC.

2. I have examined Annexure-A copy of CMP No.369/2012, Annexure B copy of FIR in Crime No.220/2012 of Ottappalam Police Station, Annexure C copy of the final report filed by the Sub Inspector of Police, Annexure D copy of the Plaint in O.S.No.892/2011, Sub Court, Palakkad, Cr.M.C.No. 4509 OF20132 Annexure E copy of the written statement filed by the defendant in O.S.52/2012, Sub Court Palakkad and Annexure F copy of the written statement filed by the defendant in O.S.No.52/2012, Sub Court, Palakkad. The materials perused primarily disclose offence under Sections 341, 323, 384, 386, 468, 471, 506(i) read with Section 34 of IPC. The Crl.M.C. is filed seeking to quash Crime No.220/2012 of Ottappalam Police Station pending as C.C.No.292/2012 of Judicial First Class Magistrate Court Ottappalam. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to allow the prayer. Accordingly, Crl.M.C. is dismissed without prejudice to the right of the petitioners to prefer a petition for discharge, if so advised. The petitioners are at liberty to raise all the contentions alongwith supporting materials. Sd/- HARUN-UL-RASHID, JUDGE. /True Copy/ P.A. To Judge SKV

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial