Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Murukan Vs. State of Kerala

Murukan vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Oct 04, 2013
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1095666

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Murukan

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....no.10/2013 on the file of judicial first class magistrate court-i, kochi. annex a3 : copy of the summons served to2d petitioner in cp no.10/2013 on the file of the judicial first class magistrate court-i, kochi. annex a4 : computer copy of the bail order dtd.2.1.2012 in ba no.10306/2011 of this hon'ble court. annex a5 : computer copy of the bail order dtd.9.1.2012 in ba no.10438/2011 of this hon'ble court. respondent(s)' annexures: nil /true copy/ p.a.to.judge sts p.bhavadasan, j.- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - crl.m.c. no. 4325 of 2013 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - dated this the 04th day of october, 2013 order the limited prayer in this application is that on surrender, apprehending that they may be remanded to custody, the petitioners want a positive direction to the judicial first class magistrate-i, kochi, to release them on bail on their appearance in c.p.no.10/2013 as early, on the same day itself.2. it is evident from the reading of the petition that a non-bailable warrant is pending execution against the petitioner. whatever that be, it will not be appropriate for this court to direct the court below to grant bail on surrender. it is only appropriate that they shall appear before the court concerned and appraise the said court the circumstances under which omission happened to occur and move appropriate application for necessary reliefs. crl.m.c. no. 4325 of 2013 -2- this petition is disposed of reserving the liberty of the petitioners to surrender before the court below and move appropriate application for bail or such other reliefs as are necessary and the learned magistrate shall dispose it of in accordance with law, preferably on the same day itself, keeping in view annexures a4 and a5 orders passed by this court, the copy of which have been produced by the petitioners along with their application. p.bhavadasan judge ds

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN FRIDAY,THE4H DAY OF OCTOBER201312TH ASWINA, 1935 Crl.MC.No. 4325 of 2013 () --------------------------- CP.NO. 10/2013 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT -I,KOCHI CRIME NO. 1450/2011 OF NARAKKAL POLICE STATION ,ERNAKULAM DISTRICT ---------------------------------- PETITIONERS : --------------------------- 1. MURUKAN, AGED40YEARS, S/O. THANKAPPAN, AMMAPPARAMBIL HOUSE, ELAMKUNNAPUZHA P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

2. SHYJU, AGED45YEARS,S/O. RAJAN, PANIKKASSERY HOUSE, ELAMKUNNAPUZHA P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS.SRI.P.P.SUBHASH CHANDRAN SRI.SHAJI THANKAPPAN RESPONDENT : --------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NARAKKAL POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.DHANESH MATHEW MANJOORAN THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON0410-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: sts Crl.MC.No. 4325 of 2013 () -------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES: ---------------------------------------------- ANNEX A1 : COPY OF THE FIR AND FI STATEMENT IN CRIME NO.1450/11 OF NARAKKAL POLICE STATION. ANNEX A2 : COPY OF THE SUMMONS SERVED TO1T PETITIONER IN CP NO.10/2013 ON THE FILE OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-I, KOCHI. ANNEX A3 : COPY OF THE SUMMONS SERVED TO2D PETITIONER IN CP NO.10/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-I, KOCHI. ANNEX A4 : COMPUTER COPY OF THE BAIL ORDER

DTD.2.1.2012 IN BA NO.10306/2011 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. ANNEX A5 : COMPUTER COPY OF THE BAIL ORDER

DTD.9.1.2012 IN BA NO.10438/2011 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO.JUDGE sts P.BHAVADASAN, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Crl.M.C. No. 4325 of 2013 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 04th day of October, 2013 ORDER

The limited prayer in this application is that on surrender, apprehending that they may be remanded to custody, the petitioners want a positive direction to the Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Kochi, to release them on bail on their appearance in C.P.No.10/2013 as early, on the same day itself.

2. It is evident from the reading of the petition that a non-bailable warrant is pending execution against the petitioner. Whatever that be, it will not be appropriate for this Court to direct the court below to grant bail on surrender. It is only appropriate that they shall appear before the court concerned and appraise the said court the circumstances under which omission happened to occur and move appropriate application for necessary reliefs. Crl.M.C. No. 4325 of 2013 -2- This petition is disposed of reserving the liberty of the petitioners to surrender before the court below and move appropriate application for bail or such other reliefs as are necessary and the learned Magistrate shall dispose it of in accordance with law, preferably on the same day itself, keeping in view Annexures A4 and A5 orders passed by this Court, the copy of which have been produced by the petitioners along with their application. P.BHAVADASAN JUDGE ds

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial