Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Mohan Lal Vs. Bansi Lal

Mohan Lal vs Bansi Lal

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Sep 24, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1095193

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mohan Lal

Respondent

Bansi Lal

Excerpt

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi % order delivered on: september 24, 2013 + rc. rev. no.228/2013 & c.m. no.10127/2013 mohan lal through ..... petitioner mr.rajender, adv. alongwith petitioner in person versus bansi lal through ..... respondent mr.j.m. kalia, adv. respondent in person coram: hon'ble mr. justice manmohan singh manmohan singh, j.(oral) 1. the petitioner mohan lal filed the present revision petition for setting aside the impugned order dated 19th february, 2013 passed by the additional rent controller, central, delhi, in eviction petition bearing no.e-155/2011 filed by the respondent under section 14(1)(e) on the ground of bonafide requirement, whereby the application for leave to defend filed by the petitioner was dismissed.2. the brief facts as stated in the eviction petition are that the respondent is the owner of the property in question. the petitioner is tenant in respect of one shop no.10 in the property no.11881/1, street no.10, sat nagar, karol bagh, new delhi, measuring 6½ ft x9

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order delivered on: September 24, 2013 + RC. Rev. No.228/2013 & C.M. No.10127/2013 MOHAN LAL Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Rajender, Adv. alongwith Petitioner in person versus BANSI LAL Through ..... Respondent Mr.J.M. Kalia, Adv. respondent in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.

(ORAL) 1. The petitioner Mohan Lal filed the present revision petition for setting aside the impugned order dated 19th February, 2013 passed by the Additional Rent Controller, Central, Delhi, in eviction petition bearing No.E-155/2011 filed by the respondent under Section 14(1)(e) on the ground of bonafide requirement, whereby the application for leave to defend filed by the petitioner was dismissed.

2. The brief facts as stated in the eviction petition are that the respondent is the owner of the property in question. The petitioner is tenant in respect of one shop No.10 in the property No.11881/1, Street No.10, Sat Nagar, Karol Bagh, New Delhi, measuring 6½ ft X9

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial